SM  Vol.4 No.2 , April 2014
The Spirit of Motivational Interviewing as an Apparatus of Governmentality. An Analysis of Reading Materials Used in the Training of Substance Abuse Clinicians
Author(s) Tony Carton*
ABSTRACT

Substance abuse clinicians working at the coal face with clients daily are confronted with client problems that are robust and tangible. The understanding of these problems is granted epistemological and ontological legitimacy by the psy-sciences. As a result, practice in the substance abuse treatment and addiction fields are rarely subject to the scrutiny provided by post-structural analysis. Moreover, the disciplines of addiction treatment and sociology rarely collaborate in any meaningful way for numerous reasons. For the AoD clinician caught betwixt and between biological psychological and sociological discourses, there has been a tendency to opt for the perceived problem solving capabilities of psychological discourses. However, in a post-aetiological hemisphere, attention is increasingly fixated on the fiscal imperative. Clinician/Client relationships have been reconfigured in neo-liberal society. In this study, materials used to train undergraduate students Motivational Interviewing skills in an Alcohol and Drug degree programme were subject to a textual analysis deploying the Foucaultian concept of governmentality. The familiar aetiological descriptor model used in the field was transposed into the Foucaultian term discourse. One article subject to analysis is presented here. The intention was to interrogate the effects of Motivational Interviewing on client and clinician and the resultant repositioning. It was found that Motivational Interviewing technologies reposition the client as an active self-governing autonomous subject while the clinician is professionally and spiritually imprecated in the manufacture of a neo liberal subjectivity within the client. It is argued that the client/clinician interaction constituted, owes less to clinical considerations than to contemporary neo liberal agendas. Proponents of the practice cite progressive and enlightened facets of Motivational Interviewing through an uncritical indebtedness to ascendant resilience and strength based discourses. Alternatively it can be understood as an individualising strategy that displaces clients from former robust communities of understanding, latterly positioned as primitive or deficit ridden. In the resulting motif client/clinician interaction is reconfigured so that the active rational, self-empowered client is produced by the newly embourgoised clinician. Clinical concerns are casually jettisoned. Thus Motivational Interviewing is at once a political/apolitical apparatus, which requires further interrogation.


Cite this paper
Carton, T. (2014) The Spirit of Motivational Interviewing as an Apparatus of Governmentality. An Analysis of Reading Materials Used in the Training of Substance Abuse Clinicians. Sociology Mind, 4, 192-205. doi: 10.4236/sm.2014.42019.
References
[1]   Adrian, M. (2003). How Can Sociological Theory Help Our Understanding of Addictions? Substance Use & Abuse, 10, 1385-1423.

[2]   Alcoholic Advisory Council of New Zealand (1997). Upper Limits for Responsible Drinking. Wellington.

[3]   Alcoholics Anonymous (1976). Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous.

[4]   American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

[5]   Bell, A. (1997). Comparing Motivational Interviewing with Other Counselling Approaches Motivational Interviewing Training for Trainer’s Course Material. Auckland. (Based on Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991) Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behaviour.) New York: Guilford Press.

[6]   Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

[7]   Burke, B., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials, [Electronic Version]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical, 71, 843-861.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843

[8]   Chaudron, C. W. (1988). Theories on Alcoholism. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.

[9]   Cohen, S. (2002). Folk Devils and Moral Panics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

[10]   Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality, Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.

[11]   Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, an Introduction (R. Hurley trans.). Hammondsworth: Penguin.

[12]   Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

[13]   Giddens, A. (2002). Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.

[14]   Gilberd, D., & Gilberd, K. (2001). Basic Personal Counselling. Malaysia: Prentice Hall.

[15]   Huxley, A. (2007). Brave New World. London: Vintage Books.

[16]   Joseph, J., Breslin, C., & Skinner, H. (1999). Critical Perspectives on the Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change.

[17]   Larner, W. (2000). Neo Liberalism: Policy, Ideology, and Governmentality [Electronic Version]. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5-25.

[18]   Manthey, T. J., Knowles, B., Asher, D., & Wahab, S. (2011). Strengths-Based Practice and Motivational Interviewing. Advances in Social Work, 12.

[19]   May, C. (1997). Habitual Drunkards and the Invention of Alcoholism: Susceptibility and Culpability in Nineteenth Century England [Electronic Version]. Addiction Research, 5, 169-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/16066359709005258

[20]   May, C. (2001). Pathology, Identity and the Social Construction of Alcohol Dependence [Electronic Version]. Sociology, 35, 385-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000189

[21]   Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.

[22]   Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.

[23]   Orwell, G. (2008). Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York: Signet.

[24]   Reinarman, C. (2005). Addiction as Accomplishment: The Discursive Construction of Disease [Electronic Version]. Addiction Research & Theory, 13, 307-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16066350500077728

[25]   Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856

[26]   Silverman, D. (2005). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage Publications.

[27]   Thombs, D. L. (1999). Introduction to Addictive Behaviours. New York: The Guildford Press.

[28]   Todd, F. (2001). Co-Existing Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders. Christchurch, NZ: National Centre for Treatment Development.

[29]   Valverde, M., & White-Mair, K. (1999). “One Day at a Time” and Other Slogans for Everyday Life: The Ethical Practices of Alcoholics Anonymous [Electronic Version]. Sociology, 33, 393-410.

[30]   Zeeman, L., Poggenpoel, M., Myburgh, C. E., & Van der Linde, N. (2002). An Introduction to Educational Research: Discourse Analysis [Electronic Version]. Education, 123, 96-103.

 
 
Top