PSYCH  Vol.5 No.6 , April 2014
Gender Differences in Experiencing US Daily Life
Author(s) John P. Robinson*
ABSTRACT

The American Time-Use Survey (ATUS), conducted by the US Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has been collecting data on how Americans spend their time since 2003, using the method of the daily time diary. In these diaries, survey respondents are asked to recall all of their activities across the previous 24 hours. In 2010, the ATUS began supplementing these simple activity accounts with ratings on five psychological states (sad, tired, stress, pain and happy) from a Social Well-Being (SWB) index designed to capture how these respondents feel as they engage in these daily activities. Thus, this ATUS study basically provides a continuous national monitor of Americans’ everyday subjective quality of life (QOL)—and in “real time” as personally experienced by respondents. Analysis of these 2010-12 ATUS SWB ratings from more than 12,000 Americans aged 15 and older reveal that women score significantly higher than men on all five factors, even though only one of the adjectives (happy) was in the positive direction. Thus, US women described their daily activities as more stressful, tiring, sad and painful, but at the same time also describing their activities as making them feel happier (suggesting that women see their lives as more engaging, intense or energizing). In order to control for this gender difference, a simple scale was derived from two of the items that conveyed basically the same emotional state, namely happy and sad. When these ratings on two items were paired, virtually no gender difference was found; nor were many gender differences found when they rated these feelings on the same activity. However, there were dramatic subjective differences across activities that were largely shared by both men and women, with child play, religious, volunteer and fitness activities rated near the top of enjoyment and with medical, housework and work activities nearer the bottom. These results seem generally consistent with enjoyment ratings in earlier national time-use surveys.


Cite this paper
Robinson, J. (2014). Gender Differences in Experiencing US Daily Life. Psychology, 5, 581-586. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.56068.
References
[1]   Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2009). A Summary of Trends in American Time Allocation. Social Indicators Research, 93, 70-80.

[2]   Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2014). The Day Reconstruction Method: (DRM): A Review. Social Indicators Research, 116, 255-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0279-x

[3]   Gershuny, J. (2009). Comment on Krueger and Colleagues. Social Indicators Research, 93, 23-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9379-4

[4]   Gershuny, J. (2012). National Utility: Measuring the Enjoyment of Activities. European Sociological Review, 10, 1093 1-17.

[5]   Juster, T. (2009). Some Perspectives on the Study of Time Use. Social Indicators Research, 93, 19-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9418-1

[6]   Juster, T. and Frank, S. (1985). Time, Goods, and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

[7]   Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306, 1776-1780.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572

[8]   Krueger, A. et al. (2009). Comparing Time Use and Subjective Well Being in Two Countries. Social Indicators Research, 93, 1-17.

[9]   Michelson, W. (2009). Adding Affect to Time Diary Accounts 31-32. Social Indicators Research, 93, 31-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9363-z

[10]   Robinson, J. (1993). As We Like It. American Demographics, 15, 44-48.

[11]   Robinson, J. (2014). As We (Still) Like It: Socializing, Religion, Kids Remain Our Favorite Daily Activities. Working Paper No. PWP-MPRC-2013-024. Maryland Population Research Center.
http://papers.ccpr.ucla.edu/papers/PWP-MPRC-2013-024/PWP-MPRC-2013-024.pdf

[12]   Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2008). What Do Happy People Do? Social Indicators Research, 89, 565-571.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9296-6

[13]   Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time (2nd ed.). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania Sate University Press.

[14]   Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2009). Comments on Krueger Presentation. Social Indicators Research, 93, 23-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9366-9

[15]   Szalai, A. (ed.) (1972). The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.

 
 
Top