OJCM  Vol.4 No.2 , April 2014
Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins
ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural and compressive strengths of a new sonicactivated bulk-fill system (Sonicfill) with other bulk-fill resins and a universal posterior composite resin. Materials and Methods: A low-stress flowable base resin material (SDR), a bulk-fill composite resin (Tetric Evo Ceram), a universal posterior composite (GC G-aenial), and the Sonicfill system were compared. The specimens were prepared for each group following ISO Standard 4049 (flexural strength) and ADA 27 specifications (compressive strength). One-way variance analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine the statistical differences among groups (p < 0.05). Results: The Sonicfill system presented significantly higher compressive strength than other groups (p < 0.001). For flexural strength results, although the Sonicfill system showed the highest values, no statistically significant differences were determined among all groups (p > 0.001). Conclusion: Due to the ability to place restorations with single increment and ease of use, the Sonicfill system can be an alternative for posterior restorations.


Cite this paper
Didem, A. , Gözde, Y. and Nurhan, Ö. (2014) Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins. Open Journal of Composite Materials, 4, 117-121. doi: 10.4236/ojcm.2014.42013.
References
[1]   Salerno, M., Derchi, G., Thorat, S., Ceseracciu, L., Ruffilli, R. and Barone, A.C. (2011) Surface Morphology and Mechanical Properties of New-Generation Flowable Resin Composites for Dental Restoration. Dental Materials, 27, 1221-1228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.596

[2]   Ozel, E., Korkmaz, Y., Attar, N. and Karabulut, E. (2008) Effect of One-Step Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Different Flowable Restorative Materials. Dental Materials Journal, 27, 755-764.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.755

[3]   Ilie, N. and Hickel, R. (2011) Investigations on a Methacrylate-Based Flowable Composite Based on the SDRTM Technology. Dental Materials, 27, 348-355.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014

[4]   Roggendorf, M.J., Kramer, N., Appelt, A., Naumann, M. and Frankenberger, R. (2011) Marginal Quality of Flowable 4-mm Base vs. Conventionally Layered Resin Composite. Journal of Dentistry, 39, 643-647.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004

[5]   Boaro, L.C., Goncalves, F., Guimaraes, T.C., Ferracane, J.L., Versluis, A. and Braga, R.R. (2010) Polymerization Stress, Shrinkage and Elastic Modulus of Current Low-Shrinkage Restorative Composites. Dental Materails, 26, 1144-1150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.003

[6]   www.sonicfill.kerrdental.com

[7]   Heintze, S.D. and Zimmerli, B. (2011) Relevance of in Vitro Tests of Adhesive and Composite Dental Materials. A Review in 3 Parts. Part 3: In Vitro Tests of Adhesive Systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 121, 1024-1040.

[8]   Silva, C.M. and Dias, K.R. (2009) Compressive Strength of Esthetic Restorative Materials Polymerized with Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen Light and Blue LED. Brazillian Dental Journal, 20, 54-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402009000100009

[9]   Gomec, Y., Dorter, C., Dabanoglu, A. and Koray, F. (2005) Effect of Resin-Based Material Combination on the Compressive and the Flexural Strength. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 32, 122-127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01394.x

[10]   Uctasli, M.B., Bala, O. and Güllü, A.V. (2004) Surface Roughness of Flowable and Packable Composite Resin Materials after Finishing with Abrasive Discs. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31, 1197-1202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01341.x

[11]   Christensen, G.J. (2012) Advantages and Challenges of Bulk-Fill Resins. Clinicians Report, 5, 1-5.

[12]   Ilie, N. and Hickel, R. (2009) Investigations on Mechanical Behaviour of Dental Composites.Clinical Oral Investigations, 13, 427-438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4

[13]   Burgess, J. and Cakir, D. (2010) Comparative Properties of Low-Shrinkage Composite Resins. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 31, 10-15.

[14]   Czasch, P. and Ilie, N. (2012) In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical Properties and Degree of Cure of Bulk Fill Composites. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17, 227-235.

[15]   Ersoy, M., Civelek, A., L’Hotelier, E., Say, E.C. and Soyman, M. (2004) Physical Properties of Different Composites. Dental Materials Journal, 23, 278-283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.23.278

[16]   International Standard ISO 4049 (2000) Polymer-Based Filling, Restorative and Luting Materials. Technical Committee 106-Dentistry. International Standards Organization, Geneva.

[17]   Attar, N., Tam, L.E. and McComb, D. (2003) Flow, Strength, Stiffness and Radiopacity of Flowable Resin Composites. Journal of Canadian Dental Associations, 69, 516-521.

 
 
Top