OJOG  Vol.4 No.6 , April 2014
External Cephalic Version: A Single Centre Experience
Abstract: Incidence of caesarean section for breech presentation has increased markedly. External cephalic version (ECV) is effective in reducing non cephalic presentation at births and caesarean section (CS) for breech presentation. Success rates are good but there is increasing need for induction of labour (IOL) as well as for intrapartum CS for reasons that are not clear. The aim of this study was to report the experience with ECV at a single centre where ECVs were performed by or under the guidance of one senior clinician. This was a 7-year retrospective audit of 147 ECVs at a single centre in Queensland. ECV was successful in 53.7%, 34% in nulliparous and 69% in multiparous women. Of the few variables explored, nulliparity was the only variable that was associated with poor success. Among those with successful ECV, 32 (40.5%) had IOL. Intrapartum CS rate in women who had had a successful ECV was 16.5% compared to 11% for the hospital. There was no difference in early neonatal outcome between the groups. We have confirmed a success rate that is comparable with many other studies. Mothers with successful ECV do have a higher IOL and a higher CS rate especially in women whose labour is induced. We suggest a need to look at some novel methods to increase uptake further and to improve success rates in nulliparous women.
Cite this paper: Mahomed, K. , Amaranarayana, P. and Ibiebele, I. (2014) External Cephalic Version: A Single Centre Experience. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 294-299. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2014.46045.

[1]   Hickok, D., Gordon, D., Milberg, J., Williams, M.A., et al. (1992) The Frequency of Breech Presentation by Gestational Age at Birth: A Large Population-Based Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 166, 851-852.

[2]   Hannah, M.E., Hannah, W.J., Hewson, S.A., Hodnett, E.D., et al. (2000) Planned Caesarean Section versus Planned Vaginal Birth for Breech Presentation at Term: A Randomised Multicentre Trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet, 356, 1375-1383. (00)02840-3

[3]   Hutton, E.K., Hannah, M.E. and Barrett, J. (2002) Use of External Cephalic Version for Breech Pregnancy and Mode of Delivery for Breech and Twin Pregnancy: A Survey of Canadian Practitioners. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 24, 804-810.

[4]   Hofmeyr, G.J. and Kulier, R. (2005) External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at Term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD000083. CD000083

[5]   Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006) The Management of Breech Presentation. Guideline No. 20b. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Green Top Guidelines.

[6]   External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Breech Presentation (2006) Green Top Guidelines No.20a. RCOG Press, London.

[7]   American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) (2000) Clinical Management Guidelines for ObstetricianGynecologists: External Cephalic Version. ACOG Practice Bull, 13, 380-385.

[8]   Kok, M., Cnossen, J., Gravendeel, L., Van Der Post, J.A., et al. (2008) Clinical Factors to Predict the Outcome of External Cephalic Version: A Metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 199, 630.e1-630.e7.

[9]   Benmeir, A., Erez, Y., Sela, H.Y., Shveiky, D., et al. (2008) Prognostic Parameters for Successful External Cephalic Version. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 21, 660-662.

[10]   Cho, L.Y., Lau, W.L., Lo, T.K., Tang, H.H., et al. (2012) Predictors of Successful Outcomes after External Cephalic Version in Singleton Term Breech Pregnancies: A Nine Year Historical Cohort Study. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 18, 11-19.

[11]   Obeidat, N., Lataifeh, I., Al-Khateeb, M., Zeyed, F., et al. (2011) Factors Associated with the Success of External Cephalic Version of Breech Presentation at Term. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 38, 386-389.

[12]   Hutton, E.K., Hannah, M.E., Ross, S.J., Delisle, M.F., et al. (2011) Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: An International Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Timing of ECV for Breech Pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 118, 564-577.

[13]   Goetzinger, K.R., Harper, L.M., Tuuli, M.G., Macones, G.A., et al. (2011) Effect of Regional Anesthesia on the Success Rate of External Cephalic Version: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 1137-1144.

[14]   Bogner, G., Hammer, B.E., Schausberger, C., Fischer, T., et al. (2013) Patient Satisfaction with Childbirth and External Cephalic Version. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 289, 523-531.

[15]   Kabiri, D., Elram, T., Aboo-dia, M., Elami-Suzin, M. et al. (2011) Timing of Delivery after External Cephalic Version and the Risk for Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 209-213.

[16]   Clock, C., Kurtzman, J., White, J. and Chung, H. (2009) Cesarean Risk after Successful External Cephalic Version: A Matched, Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Perinatology, 29, 96-100.

[17]   Chan, L., Tang, J., Tsoi, K., Fok, W.Y., et al. (2004) Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery after Successful External Cephalic Version: A Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 104, 155-160.

[18]   Kuppens, S.M.I., Hutton, E.K., Hasaart, T.H.M., et al. (2012) Mode of Delivery Following Successful External Cephalic Version: Comparison with Spontaneous Cephalic Presentations at Delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 35, 883-888.

[19]   Abenhaim, H.A., Varin, J. and Boucher, M. (2009) External Cephalic Version among Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery: Report on 36 Cases and Review of the Literature. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 37, 156-160.

[20]   Higgins, M.F., Monteith, C., Foley, M. and O’Herlihy, C. (2013) Real Increasing Incidence of Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Following Previous Caesarean Section. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 19, S0301-S2115.