BLR  Vol.5 No.1 , March 2014
Edict in Pre-Colonial India: An Analysis from the New Haven Perspective1
Author(s) Fozia Nazir Lone*
ABSTRACT

The territory of India is the locus of an ancient and deeply philosophical culture. This land not only gave birth to the epic religion of Hinduism but also to the first urban civilization, the Indus Valley Civilization. Many different kingdoms such as Mauryan Empire and Mughal Empire with customary authoritative decision practices also emerged in the Indian subcontinent. However, the impact these deep and distinct cultures, civilizations and empires have had on decision-making and official behavior in India over the decades has not been studied. This article seeks to study the notion of law/interstate law in pre-colonial India, how it was formulated during and in what way/s the process of making law was different from western traditions of law-making. To achieve this end, the New Haven methodology will be adopted. This work will also provide some preliminary conclusions in relation to Indian foreign policy which remains “formalist dualism” from ancient to current times.


Cite this paper
Lone, F. (2014). Edict in Pre-Colonial India: An Analysis from the New Haven Perspective1. Beijing Law Review, 5, 89-101. doi: 10.4236/blr.2014.51008.
References
[1]   Aiyangar, R. (1916). Ancient Indian Polity. Chennai: University of Madras.

[2]   Alexandrowicz, C. H. (1965-1966). Kautilyan Principles and the Law of Nations. British Yearbook of International Law, 41, 301.

[3]   Alexandrowicz, C. H. (1967). An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies at 14.

[4]   Anghie, A. (1999). Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 40, 1.

[5]   Baldridge, J. (2002). Linguistic and Social Characteristics of Indian English. Language in India, 2.
http://www.languageinindia.com/junjul2002/baldridgeindianenglish.html

[6]   Boesche, R. (2002). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra (Lexington Books).

[7]   Brekke, T. (2004). Wielding the Rod of Punishment—War and Violence in the Political Science of Kautilya. Journal of Military Ethics, 3, 40-52.

[8]   Carty, C., & Lone, F. N. (2011). Some New Haven International Law Reflections on China, India and Their Various Territorial Disputes. Asia Pacific Law Review, 19, 93-111 at 96.

[9]   Chatterjee, H. (1958). International Law and Inter-State Relations in Ancient India.

[10]   Chaudhuri, S. (2009) The Tongues We Speak.

[11]   Chimini, B. S. (2010). International Law Scholarship in Post-Colonial India: Coping with Dualism. Leiden Journal of Inter-National Law, 23, 23-51.

[12]   Dossani, R. (2008). India Arriving: How This Economic Powerhouse is Redefining Global Business. New York: American Management Association.

[13]   Dossani, R. (2008). India Arriving: How This Economic Powerhouse is Redefining Global Business. New York: American Management Association.

[14]   Dumont, L. (1962). Conception of Kingship in Ancient India. Contributions to Indian Sociology.

[15]   Emmott, B. (2008). Rivals: How the Power Struggle between China, India and Japan will Shape our Next Decade. New York: Harcourt Inc.

[16]   Fravel, T. (2008). Strong Borders, Secure Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[17]   Ginsburg, T. (2010). Eastphalia as the Perfection of Wesphalia. Global Legal Studies, 17, 27.

[18]   Gonda, J. (1969) Ancient Indian Kingship from the religious Point of View. (Leiden,70)

[19]   Gong, G. W. (1984). The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[20]   Guha, R. (2007) India after Gandhi—The History of the World’s Largest Democracy, Picador.

[21]   Kim, S. W., Fidler, D. P., & Ganguly, S. (2009). Eastphalia Rising? Asian Influence and the Fate of Human Security. World Policy Journal, 26, 53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/wopj.2009.26.2.53

[22]   Kossel, C. G. (2002). Natural Law and Human Law. In S. J. Pope (Ed.), The Ethics of Aquinas. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

[23]   Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry.

[24]   Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1943). Legal Education and Public Policy: Professional Training in the Public Interest. Yale Law Journal, 52, 203-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/792244

[25]   Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1976). The Relation of Law to Social Process: Trends in Theories about law. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 37, 465-485.

[26]   Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law. Science and Policy, Volume I & II, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

[27]   Linghat, R. (1973). The Classical Law of India. (Translated from French with Additions by J. Duncan, & M. Derrett, Berkeley, CA: University of California)

[28]   Lone, F. N. (2009). The Creation Story of Kashmiri People: The Right to Self-Determination. Denning Law Journal, 21, 1-25.

[29]   McDougal, M. S., & Lasswell. H. D. (1971). Criteria for a Theory about Law. Southern California Law Review, 44, 362-394, 376.

[30]   McDougal. M. S. (1953). International Law, Power, and Policy: A Contemporary Conception. Recueil des Cours, Hague Academy of International Law, 82, 133.

[31]   Moloney, P. (2011). Hobbes, Savagery, and International Anarchy. American Political Science Review, 105, 189-204.

[32]   Nanda, V. P. (1991). International Law in Ancient Hindu India. In M. W. Janis (Ed.), The Influence of Religion on the Development of International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

[33]   Nayar, B. R., & Paul, T. V. (2003). India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[34]   Pan, J. W. (2011). Chinese Philosophy and International Law. Asian Journal of International Law, 1, 233-248.

[35]   Paulus. A. (2013). International Community in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
http://opil.ouplaw.com

[36]   Penna, L. R. (1985). Traditional Asian Approaches: An Indian View. Australian Year Book of International Law, 9, 168.

[37]   Radcliffe-Brown (1965). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. 199. (Cited in Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1976). The Relation of Law to Social Process: Trends in Theories about Law, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 37, 465-485.)

[38]   Reisman, W. M. (1992). The View from the New Haven School of International Law. In Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 118, Paper 867.

[39]   Roy (2004) The Ordinary Person’s Guide to Empire. Malton: Flamingo.

[40]   Sarkar, B. K. (1919). Hindu Theory of International Relations. The American Political Science Review, 13, 400-414.

[41]   Shahabuddin, S. (2009) Approximate Muslim Population in India [2001]. The Milli Gazette (Indian Muslims’ Leading English Newspaper).

[42]   Sharma, R. S. (2008). Rethinking India’s Past (OUP).

[43]   Singh, A. N., & Singh, P. (2009). What Can International Law Learn from Indian Mythology, Hinduism and History? Journal of East Asia & International Law, 2, 239-271.

[44]   Singh, B. (1964). The Sources of Contemporary Political Thought in India—A Reappraisal. Ethics, 75, 57-62.

[45]   Spellman, J. W. (1964). Political Theory of Ancient India.

[46]   Stein, O. (1921). Megasthenes and Kautilya.

[47]   Suzuki, E. (1974) The New Haven School of International Law: An Invitation to a Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence. Yale Studies in World Public Order, 1, 1.

[48]   Turmanidze, T. (2009) Buffer States: Power Policies, Foreign Policies and Concepts. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

[49]   Zhao, H. (2007) India and China: Rivals or Partners in Southeast Asia? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29, 121-142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/CS29-1F

 
 
Top