Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Selected Kenyan Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes by Introgression of Nicotiana Protein Kinase (npk1) to Enhance Drought Tolerance

John Vincent  Omondi Muoma; Omwoyo  Ombori

doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.56100

John Vincent Omondi Muoma^*, Omwoyo Ombori

Abstract: Currently maize production in the East and Central Africa (ECA) region is at 1.3 tonnes per hectare compared to the potential of up to 7.0 tonnes per hectare because of biotic and abiotic constraints, and this has resulted in prevalence of famine in sub-Saharan Africa. Drought is the most important abiotic stress affecting productivity of maize in Sub Saharan Africa leading to up to 70% crop loss and in certain cases total crop loss. Previous work has shown that Mitogenic Activated Protein Kinase (MAPKKK) gene activated an oxidative signal cascade, which led to tolerance to adverse condition. To analyze the role of the oxidative signal cascades on tropical maize, 4 transgenic tropical maize plants were developed through an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with a MAPKKK homology from tobacco Nicotiana Protein Kinase 1 (npk1) and the insert was confirmed using Southern and Northern blot hybridization analysis. Fertile To maize plants were obtained which were planted to generate T1 plants, which were used for comparison with non-transgenic plants. The T1 plantlets of tropical inbred TL08-(2)4, single hybrid cross of a PTL001, a multiple cross hybrid DH01 and a dry land cultivar DLC1 genotypes were planted in the greenhouse and assessed for morphological and physiological changes associated with increase in drought stress tolerance when under water stress condition. The results showed that npk1 effectively enhanced drought tolerance in TL08-(2)4 and PTL001, and there was no significant morphological difference between transgenic controls (well watered) and transgenic tests (subjected to moderate drought stress). Overall, there were between 20%-35% enhancements of yield of the transgenic stressed events compared with non-transgenic stressed control.

Keywords: Agrobacterium tumefaciens; Drought Tolerance; Nicotiana Protein Kinase; Southern Blot Hybridization; Zea mays

Cite this paper: Omondi Muoma, J. and Ombori, O. (2014) Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Selected Kenyan Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes by Introgression of Nicotiana Protein Kinase (npk1) to Enhance Drought Tolerance. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 863-883. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.56100.

References

[1] CIMMYT (1999) World Maize Facts and Trends; Maize production in drought stressed environments: Technical Operation and Research Allocation. CIMMYT: Mexico, D.F.

[2] Kanampiu, F., Ranson, J., Gressel, J., Jewell, D. and Friesen, D. (2002) Appropriateness of Biotechnology to Africa Agriculture: Striga: And maize as paradigms. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 69, 105-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015241509808

[3] Ajanga, S. and Hillocks, J. (2000) Maize Cob Rot in Kenya and Its Association with Stalk Borer damage. Crop Protection, 19, 297-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00020-X

[4] Machuka, J. (2004) Agricultural Genomics and Sustainable Development: Perspectives and Prospects for Africa. African Journal of Biotechnology, 3, 131-133.

[5] Schechert, A.W., Weltz, H.G. and Geiger, H.H. (1999) QTL for Resistance to Stesphaeriaturcica in Tropical African Maize. Crop Science, 39, 514-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900020036x

[6] FAOSTAT (2002) Agriculture Data of Africa 1995 to 2002.

[7] Heisey, P.W. and Edmeades, G.O. (1999) Maize Production in Drought Stressed Environments: Technical Options and Research Resource Allocation. Part 1 of CIMMYT 1997/98 World Maize Facts and Trends, Mexico. D.F. CIMMYT.

[8] Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (1998) Plant Physiology. 2nd Edition, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, 725-757.

[9] Fischer, R., Rees, D., Sayre, K., Lu, Z., Condon, A. and Saavedra, A. (1998) Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies. Crop Science, 38, 1467-1475.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060011x

[10] Pettigrew, W. and Meredith, J. (1994) Leaf Gas Exchange Parameters Vary among Cotton Genotypes. Crop Science, 34, 700-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400030019x

[11] Pooter, H. and Remkes, C. (1990) Leaf Area and Net Assimilation Rate of 24 wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate. Oecologia, 83, 553-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317209

[12] Shou, H., Frame, B.R., Whitham, S.A. and Wang, K. (2004a) Assessment of Transgenic Maize Events Produced by Particle Bombardment or Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation. Molecular Breeding, 13, 201-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MOLB.0000018767.64586.53

[13] Kovtun, Y., Chiu, L., Tena, G. and Sheen, J. (2000) Functional Analysis of Oxidative Stress-Activated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade in Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 2940-2945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.6.2940

[14] Hamilton, C.M.A.F., Lewis, C. and Tanksley, S.D. (1995) Stable Transfer of Intact High Molecular Weight DNA into Plant Chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 9975-9979.

[15] Zhao, Z., Weining, G., Tishu, C., Tangliani, D., David, H., Diana, B., Sheryl, B., Marjorie, R. and Dottie, P. (2001) High Throughput Genetic Transformation Mediated by Agrobacterium tumeficiens in Maize. Molecular Breeding, 8, 323-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015243600325

[16] Ombori, O., Muoma, J. and Machuka, J. (2013). Agrobacterium-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Selected Tropical Inbred and Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) lines. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 113, 11-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0247-1

[17] Shou, H., Bordallo, P., Fan, J.B., Yeakley, J.M., Bibikova, M., Sheen, J. and Wang, K. (2004b) Expression of an Active Tobacco Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinasekinase Enhances Freezing Tolerance in Transgenic Maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 3298-3303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308095100

[18] Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1987) A Rapid DNA Isolation Procedure for Small Quantities of Fresh Leaf Tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11-15.

[19] Huang, X., Zeller, F.J., Hsam, S.L.K., Wenzel, G. and Mohler, V. (2000) Chromosomal Location of AFLP Markers in Common Wheat, Utilizing Nulli-Tetrasomic Stocks. Genome, 43, 298-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g99-118

[20] Bolanos, J. and Edmeades, G. (1996) The Importance of Anthesis-Silkinginterval in Breeding for Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize. Field Crops Research, 48, 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00036-6

[21] Dai, S., Zheng, P., Marmey, P., Zhang, S., Tian, W.Z., Chen, S.Y., Beachy, R.N. and Fau, C. (2001) Comparative Analysis of Transgenic Rice Plants Obtained by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation and Particle Bombardment. Molecular Breeding, 7, 25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009687511633

[22] Vaucheret, H., Beclin, C., Elmayan, T., Feuerbach, F., Godon, C., Morel, J., Mourrain, P., Palauqui, J.C. and Vernhettes, S. (1998) Transgene-Induced Gene Silencing in Plants. The Plant Journal, 16, 651-659.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00337.x

[23] Matzke, M. and Matzke, A. (1998) Epigenetic Silencing of Plant Transgenes as a Consequence of Diverse Cellular Defence Responses. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 54, 94-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000180050128

[24] Muskens, M.W.M., Vissers, A.P.A., Mol, J.N.M. and Kooter, J.M. (2000) Role of Inverted DNA Repeats in Transcriptional and Post Transcriptional Gene Silencing. Plant Molecular Biology, 43, 243-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006491613768

[25] Fagard, M. and Vaucheret, H. (2000) (Trans) Gene Silencing in Plants: How Many Mechanisms? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 51, 167-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.167

[26] Grandbastien, M. (1998) Activation of Plant Retro-Transposons under Stress Conditions. Trends in Plant Science, 3, 181-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01232-1