ABB  Vol.5 No.4 , March 2014
Phenotypic Class Ratios as Marker Signs of Different Types of Agamospermy
ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the development of the method for the genetic classification of agamospermous reproduction types in plants using sugar beet as an example. The classification feasibility is ensured by the use of isozymes as genetic markers allowing the identification of all three phenotypic classes in the progeny of individual heterozygous diploid plant and is based on different phenotypic class ratios in the progenies obtained by meiotic and mitotic agamospermy. The data indicate that for studied forms of sugar beet meiotic agamospermy is the more typical because 10 of 12 explored progenies were classified as those which arisen under meiotic agamospermy and only 2 as arisen under mitotic agamospermy.


Cite this paper
Kirikovich, S. and Levites, E. (2014) Phenotypic Class Ratios as Marker Signs of Different Types of Agamospermy. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 5, 393-397. doi: 10.4236/abb.2014.54047.
References
[1]   Maletskii, S.I. and Maletskaya, E.I. (1996) Self-Fertility and Agamospermy in Sugar Beet Beta vulgaris L. Russian Journal of Genetics, 32, 1643-1650.

[2]   Levites, E.V. (2005) Sugarbeet Plants Produced by Agamospermy as a Model for Studying Genome Structure and Function in Higher Plants. Sugar Tech, 7, 67-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02942532

[3]   Levites, E.V. (2007) Marker Enzyme Phenotype Ratios in Agamospermous Sugarbeet Progenies as a Demonstration of Multidimensional Encoding of Inherited Information in Plants. http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0701027

[4]   Levites, E.V. and Kirikovich, S.S. (2012) Post-Meiotic Apozygotic Combinatory Process in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2012.31011

[5]   Ammermann, D. (1971) Morphology and Development of the Macronuclei of the Ciliates Stylonychia mytilus and Euplotes aediculatus. Chromosoma, 33, 209-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00285634

[6]   Grishanin, A.K., and Akif’ev, A.P. (1999) Interpopulation Differentiation within C. kolensis and C. strenuus strenuus (Crustacea: Copepoda): Evidence from Cytogenetic Methods. Hydrobiologia, 417, 37-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003819809155

[7]   Levites, E.V. and Kirikovich, S.S. (2010) Autosegregation of Enzyme Loci Me1 and Gpi2 in Agamospermous Progenies of Triploid Sugarbeet Plants. Available from Nature Precedings. http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2010.5464.1

[8]   Levites, E.V. (2002) New Classification of the Reproduction Modes in Sugar Beet. Sugar Tech, 4, 45-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02956879

[9]   Schwartz, D. (1966) The Genetic Control of Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Maize: Gene Duplication and Repression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 56, 1431-1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.56.5.1431

[10]   Scandalios, J.G. (1969) Genetic Control of Multiple Forms of Enzymes in Plants: A Review. Biochemical Genetics, 3, 37-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00485973

[11]   Owen, F.V. (1945) Cytoplasmically Inherited Male Sterility in Sugar Beet. Journal of Agricultural Research, 71, 423-440.

[12]   Maletskii, S.I. and Konovalov, A.A. (1985) Inheritance of Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Sugar Beet: I. Analysis of Deviations from Monogenic Segregation. Genetika (Moscow), 21, 1527-1540.

[13]   Levites, E.V. (1979) The Genetic Control of NADP-Dependent Malic Enzyme in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 249, 215-217.

[14]   Levites, E.V. and Garifullina, F.Sh. (1988) Use of Isozymes as Genetic Markers for Identification of Sugar Beet Varieties. Biochemical Identification of Varieties, Proceedings of the 3th International Symposium on ISTA, Leningrad, 104-109.

[15]   Vallejos, C.E. (1983) Enzyme Activity Staining. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 469-515.

[16]   Meizel, S. and Markert, C.L. (1967) Malate Dehydrogenase Isozymes of the Marine Snail Ilyanassa obsolete. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 122, 753-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(67)90185-3

[17]   Weber, E. (1986) Grundriss der Biologischen Statistik. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.

[18]   Cionini, P.G., Cavallini, A., Corsi, R. and Fogli, M. (1982) Comparison of Homologous Polytene Chromosome in Phaseolus coccineus Embryo Suspensor Cells: Morphological, Autoradiographic and Cytophotometric Analyses. Chromosoma, 86, 383-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00292265

[19]   Maletskaya, E.I. and Maletskaya, S.S. (1999) The Nuclear DNA Mass Variability in Embryo Root Cells of Sugarbeet. Sugar Tech, 1, 30-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02945157

[20]   Levites, E.V., Shkutnik, T., Ovechkina, O.N. and Maletskii, S.I. (1999) Pseudosegregation in the Agamospermic Progeny of Male Sterile Plants of the Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Doklady Biological Sciences, 365, 182-184.

[21]   Guo, M., Davies, D. and Birchler, J.A. (1996) Dosage Effects on Gene Expression in a Maize Ploidy Series. Genetics, 142, 1349-1355.

 
 
Top