JSS  Vol.2 No.4 , April 2014
Study of the Standard Insurance Provisions’ Interpretation
Author(s) Yang Yang
The new insurance law has been implemented for a long time, but it is still disputed frequently for the application of standard insurance clause. We can see this from many cases, e.g. the Sued People’s Insurance Company of China LLC, Jinyun Branch office Insurance contract Dispute Case by Li Shangzhi. This paper is trying to take the standard insurance clause as the beginning point to briefly analyze the reason for the terms’ understanding differences and to study their unfavorable interpretation principle through comparing the provisions’ samples in the old and new insurance law, which can be looked forward to providing some ideas for their corresponding practice.

Cite this paper
Yang, Y. (2014) Study of the Standard Insurance Provisions’ Interpretation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 206-209. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.24021.
[1]   Wang, L.M. (2002) The Law Research for Contract. 2nd Edition, China Renmin University Press Ltd., Beijing.

[2]   The Magic Weapon of Peking University (2009) Zhejiang Jinyun County People’s Court Civil Written Judgment 2009 Li Red Business Character No. 984.

[3]   Shi, W.S. (1985) General Expositions of Insurance Law. 2nd Edition, San Min Book Press Ltd., Taiwan.

[4]   Ren, Y.S. (2009) Research for the Interpretation Principle to the Formatted Clause of Insurance Contract-Discussed the Revised Value for the Article 30st of New Insurance Law. Journal of Insurance Research, 12, 110-114.

[5]   Knox, M.R. (1985) Insurance Contract: Rule of Construction, Judicial, Consumerism, and Coverage. 1st Edition, New L.J., London.