ENG  Vol.6 No.3 , March 2014
Analysis of Biomechanical Behaviour of Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Methods: Finite Element Method and Experimental Tests

The main objective of this study was to compare the results obtained with both virtual and experimental research methods, when the biomechanical behavior of teeth restored with esthetic posts was investigated. The finite element method was used to develop models of healthy maxillary canines and maxillary canines restored with definitive crowns and glass-fiber posts, quartzfiber posts, and titanium posts. Stress distribution was observed when external loads were applied. Load was applied in-vitro to analyse the fracture resistance of 48 maxillary canines restored in the same way as it was considered in the virtual method. The analysis of results using the finite element method led to the conclusion that restored teeth, in which the elastic modulus of the post was similar to that of the dentine and the material of the core had the best biomechanical performance. The experimental study validated the virtual analysis.

Cite this paper
Bessone, L. , Bodereau, E. , Cabanillas, G. and Dominguez, A. (2014) Analysis of Biomechanical Behaviour of Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Methods: Finite Element Method and Experimental Tests. Engineering, 6, 148-158. doi: 10.4236/eng.2014.63018.

[1]   Angobaldo, A.S. (1999) Factores Biomecánicos de Resistencia de la Dentina del Diente Endodónticamente Tratado. Revista Mundo Odontológico (Perú), 37, 40-44.

[2]   Duret, B., Duret, F. and Reynaud, M. (1996) Long Life Physical Property Preservation and Postendodontic Rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry Supplement, S50-S56.

[3]   Ho, M.H., Lee, S.Y., Chen, H.H. and Lee, M.C. (1994) Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Posts on Stress Distribution in Dentin. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 72, 367-372.

[4]   Toksavul, S., Zor, M., Toman, M., Güngor, M.A., Nejgis, I. and Artunc, C. (2006) Analysis of Dentinal Stress Distribution of Maxillary Central Incisors Subjected to Various Posts and Core Applications. Operative Dentistry, 31, 89-96.

[5]   Malferrari, S., Mónaco, C. and Scotti, R. (2003) Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Restored with Quartz-Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16, 39-44.

[6]   Vega del Barrio, J.M. (1996) Sistemas Adhesivos. En: Materiales en Odontología, Ediciones Avances, Madrid, 315-332.

[7]   De Jager, N., De Kler, M. and Vanderzel, J. (2006) The Influence of Different Core Material on the FEA Determined Stress Distribution in Dental Crowns. Dental Materials, 22, 234-242.

[8]   Boschian Pest, L., Cavalli, G., Bertani, P. and Gagliani, M. (2003) Adhesive Post-Endodontic Restorations with Fiber Posts: Push-Out Tests and SEM Observations. En: Arte y Ciencia de los Materiales Odontológicos, Ediciones Avances, Madrid, 49-57.

[9]   Eskitascioglu, G., Belli, S. and Kalkan, M. (2002) Evaluation of Two Posts Core Systems Using Two Different Methods (Fracture Strengths Test and a Finite Elemental Analysis). Journal of Endodontics, 28, 629-633.

[10]   Barjau Escribano, A., Sancho-Bue, J.L., Torner Navarro, L., Rodríguez Cervantes, P.J., Pérez González, A. and Sánchez Marín, F.T. (2006) Influence of Prefabricated Post Material on Restored Teeth: Fracture Strength and Stress Distribution. Operative Dentistry, 31, 47-54.

[11]   Libman, W.J. and Nicholls, J.I. (1995) Load Fatigue of Teeth Restored with Cast Post and Core and Complete Crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 8, 155-161.

[12]   Langer, B., Stein, S.D. and Wagenberg, B. (1981) An Evaluation of Root Resection. A 10 Year Study. Journal of Periodontology, 52, 719-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.12.719

[13]   Li, L., et al. (2006) Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Weakened Roots Restored with Different Cements in Combination with Titanium Alloy Posts. Chinese Medical Journal, 119, 305-311.

[14]   Manocci, F., Ferrari, M. and Watson, T.F. (2001) Microleakage of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Fiber Posts and Composite Cores Alter Cyclic Loading: A Confocal Microscopic Study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 85, 284-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113706

[15]   Holmes, D.C., Diaz Arnold, A.M. and Leary, J.M. (1996) Influence of Post Dimension on Stress Distribution in Dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 75, 140-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90090-6

[16]   Ko, C.C., Chu, C.S., Chung, K.H. and Lee, M.C. (1992) Effects of Posts on Dentin Stress Distribution in Pulpless Teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 68, 421-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90404-X

[17]   Eraslan, O., Aykent, F., Yucel, M.T. and Akman, S. (2009) The Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Ferrule Height Onstress Distribution at Post-and-Core-Restored All-Ceramic Anterior Crowns. Clinical Oral Investigations, 13, 223227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0217-5

[18]   Pegoretti, A., Frambri, L., Zappini, G. and Bianchetti, M. (2002) Finite Element Analysis of a Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite Endodontic Post. Biomaterials, 23, 2667-2682.

[19]   Lanza, A., Aversa, R., Rengo, S., Apicella, D. and Apicella, A. (2005) 3D FEA of Cemented Stell Glass and Carbon Posts in a Maxillary Incisor. Dental Materials, 21, 709-715.

[20]   Adanir, N. and Belli, S. (2008) Evaluation of Different Post Lengths’ Effect on Fracture Resistance of a Glass Fiber Post System. European Journal of Dentistry, 2, 23-28.

[21]   Soares, C.J., Soares, P.V., de Freitas Santos-Filho, P.C., Castro, C.G., Magalhaes, D. and Versluis, A. (2008) The Influence of Cavity Design and Glass Fiber Posts on Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Premolars. Journal of Endodontics, 34, 1015-1019.

[22]   Soares, C.J., Santana, F.R., Castro, C.G., Santos-Filho, P.C., Soares, P.V., Qian, F. and Armstrong, S.R. (2008) Finite Element Analysis and Bond Strength of a Glass Post to Intraradicular Dentin: Comparison between Microtensile and Pushout Tests. Dental Materials, 24, 1405-1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.004

[23]   Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I. and Sadan, A. (2008) Biomechanical Considerations for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Part II (Evaluation of Fatigue Behavior, Interfaces, and in Vivo Studies). Quintessence International, 39, 117-129.

[24]   Newman, M.P., Yaman, P., Dennison, J., Rafter, M. and Billi, E. (2003) Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Composite Posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89, 360-367.

[25]   Hayashi, M., Takahashi, Y., Imazato, S. and Ebisu, S. (2006) Fracture Resistance of Pulpless Teeth with Posts Cores and Crowns. Dental Materials, 22, 477-485.

[26]   Maccari, P.C., Conceicao, E. and Nunes, M. (2003) Fracture Resistance of Endodontic Treated Teeth Restored with Three Different Prefabricated Esthetic Posts. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 15, 25-31.

[27]   Cormier, C.J., Burns, D.R. and Moon, P. (2001) In Vitro Comparison of the Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Fiber, Ceramic and Conventional Post Systems at Various Stages of Restoration. Journal of Prosthodontics, 10, 26-36.

[28]   Gordon, J.E. (1984) The New Science of Strong Materials or Why You Don’t Fall trough the Floor. University Press, Princeton.