Parental lines, F1 generation of domesticated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium L. were evaluated at Department of Crop Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka for improvement in their quantitative traits. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Data were collected on the quantitative traits and fruit yield. Better Parent Heterosis (BPH), genetic variances, gene effects and heritability of the traits were estimated for the hybrids. BPH result showed that the Wild × Petomech cross had the highest positive BPH of 358.36% in fruit yield. The highest negative BPH of -95.59% was recorded for the hybrid, Wild × Grosso in average fruit weight while the hybrid, Insulata × Grosso had the lowest negative BPH of -16.27% in average fruit weight. Additive gene action and additive × additive gene action (aa) were significantly in control of three crosses, W × P, W × In and W × G in fruit yield. Additive variance was higher than dominance variance in fruit yield for all the hybrids with wild as one of its parents. Again, hybrids with wild as one of its parent as, W × G, W × In, and W × P had the highest narrow sense heritability in fruit yield (59.15%, 51.69%, 59.88%, respectively). High level of epistasis controlled some of the quantitative traits and hybridization evidenced by the result was effective in developing new tomato cultivars with positive heterotic effects in fruit yield.
 Kumar, Y.K.H., Patil, S.S., Dharmatti, P.R., Byadagi, A.S., Kajjidoni, S.T. and Patil, R.H. (2009) Estimation of Heterosis for Topovirius Resistance in Tomato. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22, 1073-1075.
 Melchinger, A.E. (1999) Genetic Diversity and Heterosis. In: Coors, J.G. and Stuab, J.E., Eds., The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis and Crop Plants, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, 99-118.
 Choudhary, B., Punia, R.S. and Sangha, H.S. (1965) Manifestation of Hybrid Vigour in F1 and Its Correlation in F2 Generations of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 22, 55-59.
 William, W. (1959) The Heterosis and the Genetics of Complex Characters. Nature, 184, 527-530.
 Mather, K. and Jinks, J.I. (1977) Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London.
 Hayman, B.I. (1958) The Separation of Epistatic from Additive and Dominance Variation in Generation Means. Heredity, 12, 371-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1958.36
 Ghosh, K.P., Islam, A.K.M.A., Main, M.A.K. and Hossain, M.M. (2010) Variability and Character Association in F2 Segregating Population at Different Commercial Hybrids of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 14, 91-95.
 Causse, M., Buret, M., Robini, K. and Verschave, P. (2003) Inheritance of Nutritional and Sensory Quality Traits in Fresh Market Tomato and Relation to Consumer Preferences. Journal of Food Science, 68, 2342-2350.
 Gamble, E.E. (1962) Gene Effects in Corn (Zea mays L.) Relative Importance of Gene Effects for Plant Height and Certain Components Attributes of Yield. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 42, 349-358.
 Zdravkovic, J., Pavlovic, N., Girek, Z., Milka, B.J., Savic, D., Zdravkovic, M. and Cvikic, D. (2011) Generation Mean Analysis of Yield Component and Yield in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43, 1575-1580.