[1] Duhem, P. (1962). The aim and structure of physical theory. New York: Atheneum.
[2] Harper, W. L. (2011). Isaac Newton’s scientific method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3] Hume, D. (1959). A treatise of human nature. Book 1. London: Everyman.
[4] Koyré, A. (1965). Newtonian studies. London: Chapman and Hall.
[5] Maxwell, N. (1974). The rationality of scientific discovery. Philosophy of Science, 41, 123-153, 247-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/288579
[6] Maxwell, N. (1993). Induction and scientific realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 61-79, 81-101, 275-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/44.1.61
[7] Maxwell, N. (1998). The comprehensibility of the universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[8] Maxwell, N. (2000). A new conception of science. Physics World, 13, 17-18.
[9] Maxwell, N. (2002). The need for a revolution in the philosophy of science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 33, 381-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022480009733
[10] Maxwell, N. (2004). Is science neurotic? London: Imperial College Press.
[11] Maxwell, N. (2005). Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and aim-oriented empiricism. Philosophia, 32, 181-239.
[12] Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom. London: Pentire Press.
[13] Maxwell, N. (2011). A priori conjectural knowledge in physics. In M. Shaffer, & M. Veber (Eds.), What place for the a priori (pp. 211-240)? Chicago: Open Court.
[14] Maxwell, N. (2013). Has science established that the universe is physiccally comprehensible? In A. Travena, & B. Soen (Eds.), Recent advances in cosmology. New York: Nova Publishers Inc.
[15] Newton, I. (1962). Principia, A. Motte’s translation revised by F. Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[16] Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
[17] Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[18] Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. London: Oxford University Press.