ABB  Vol.5 No.4 , March 2014
Selection of Laboratory Mice for the High Scores of Logic Task Solutions: The Correlated Changes in Behavior
Abstract: Genetically heterogenous mouse population served as the basis for experiment designed to select mice for the high levels of extrapolation ability. Extrapolation task (which belongs to the category of cognitive tasks) was the following: hungry and thirsty mouse was placed in the experimental box facing the cup with milk which could be reached via the small opening in the frontal wall. After several seconds of drinking the food moved behind this wall to the right or to the left and disappeared from animal view. Mouse can find the food only if it moves in the direction of food movement. The direction could be chosen at random or based on animal apprehension of elementary logic of this task. Mice were selected not only for high scores of this task solution but also for lack of anxiety signs during test performance. Extrapolation task scores in selected strain mice were above the chance levels in F9 but non-significantly different from those of control unselected mouse population. The performance of F9 mice in the “puzzle box” cognitive test, based on animal tendency to avoid the brightly lit area in the dark compartment with increasing “difficulty” of reaching this compartment, was measured as mean escape latencies of the respective group. The latencies of mice from selected strain were significantly shorter than those of control animals. This fact is interpreted as the sign that the selection for one cognitive trait (yet still not efficient) resulted in positive changes in the ability to solve another cognitive task. The relationship of cognitive task solutions success and anxiety behavior scores in F9 is discussed.
Cite this paper: Perepelkina, O. , Golibrodo, V. , Lilp, I. and Poletaeva, I. (2014) Selection of Laboratory Mice for the High Scores of Logic Task Solutions: The Correlated Changes in Behavior. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 5, 294-300. doi: 10.4236/abb.2014.54036.

[1]   Reznikova, Z. (2007) Animal Intelligence. From Individual to Social Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[2]   Krushinsky, L.V. (1990) Experimental Studies of Elementary Reasoning. Evolutionary, Physiological and Genetic Aspects of Behavior, Oxonian Press, New Dehli.

[3]   Zucca, P., Milos, N. and Vallortigara, G. (2007) Piagetian Object Permanence and Its Development in Eurasian Jays (Garrulus glandarius). Animal Cognition, 10, 243-258.

[4]   Krushinsky, L.V., Astaurova, N.V., Kouznetzova, L.V., Otchinskaya, E.I., Poletaeva, I.I., Romanova, L. G. and Sotskaya, M.N. (1975) The Role of Genetic Factors in Determining the Extrapolation Ability in Animals. In: Fedorov, V.K. and Ponomarenko, V.V., Eds., Current Problems in Behavioural Genetics, Nauka, Leningrad, 98-110.

[5]   Poletaeva, I.I., Romanova, L.G. and Popova, N.V. (1993) Genetic Aspects of Animal Reasoning. Behavior Genetics, 23, 467-475.

[6]   Perepelkina, O.V., Markina, N.V., Golibrodo, V.A., Lil’p, I.G. and Poletaeva, I.I. (2011) Selection of Mice for High Level of Extrapolation Capacity with Cobcommitant Low Anxiety Level. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova, 61, 742-749.

[7]   Galsworthy, M.J., Paya-Cano, J.L., Liu, L., Monleón, S., Gregoryan, G., Fernandes, C., Schalkwyk, L.C. and Plomin, R. (2005) Assessing Reliability, Heritability and General Cognitive Ability in a Battery of Cognitive Tasks for Laboratory Mice. Behavior Genetics, 35, 675-692.

[8]   Ben Abdallah, N.M., Fuss, J., Trusel, M., Galsworthy, M.J., Bobsin, K., Colacicco, G., Deacon, R.M., Riva, M.A., Kellendonk, C., Sprengel, R., Lipp, H.-P. and Gass, P. (2011) The Puzzle Box as a Simple and Efficient Behavioral Test for Exploring Impairments of General Cognition and Executive Functions in Mouse Models of Schizophrenia. Experimental Neurology, 227, 42-52.

[9]   Andrews, N. and File, S.E. (1993) Handling History of Rats Modifies Behavioural Effects of Drugs in the Elevated Plus-Maze Test of Anxiety. European Journal of Pharmacology, 235, 109-112.

[10]   Costa, R., Tamascia, M.L., Nogueira, M.D., Casarini, D.E. and Marcondes, F.K. (2012) Handling of Adolescent Rats Improves Learning and Memory and Decreases Anxiety. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 51, 548-553.

[11]   Zilles, K., Wu, J., Crusio, W.E. and Schwegler, H. (2000) Water Maze and Radial Maze Learning and the Density of Binding Sites of Glutamate, GABA, and Serotonin Receptors in the Hippocampus of Inbred Mouse Strains. Hippocampus, 10, 213-225.<213::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-Q

[12]   Steinberger, D., Reynolds, D.S., Ferris, P., Lincoln, R., Datta, S., Stanley, J., Paterson, A., Dawson, G.R. and Flint, J. (2003) Genetic Mapping of Variation in Spatial Learning in the Mouse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2426-2434.

[13]   Brooks, S.P., Pask, T., Jones, L. and Dunnett, S.B. (2005) Behavioural Profiles of Inbred Mouse Strains Used as Transgenic Backgrounds. II: Cognitive Tests. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 4, 307-317.

[14]   Podhorna, J. and Brown, R.E. (2002) Strain Differences in Activity and Emotionality Do Not Account for Differences in Learning and Memory Performance between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 Mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 1, 96-110.

[15]   Zarcone, T.J., Chen, R. and Fowler, S.C. (2004) Differential Acquisition of Food-Reinforced Disk Pressing by CD-1, BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J Mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 52, 1-9.

[16]   Escorihuela, R.M., Fernandez-Teruel, A., Gil, L., Aguilar, R., Tobena, A. and Driscoll, P. (1999) Inbred Roman Highand Low-Avoidance Rats: Differences in Anxiety Novelty-Seeking, and Shuttlebox Behaviors. Physiology & Behavior, 67, 19-26.

[17]   Jónás, I., Schubert, K.A.A., Reijne, C., Scholte, J., Garland, T., Gerkema, M.P., Scheurink, A.J.W., Nyakas, C. and van Dijk, G. (2010) Behavioral Traits Are Affected by Selective Breeding for Increased Wheel-Running Behavior in Mice. Behavior Genetics, 40, 542-550.

[18]   Paratore, S., Alessi, E., Coffa, S., Torrisi, A., Mastrobuono, F. and Cavallaro, S. (2006) Early Genomics of Learning and Memory: A Review. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5, 209-221.

[19]   Gomes, V. de C., Hassan, W., Maisonnette, S., Johnson, L.R., Ramos, A. and Landeira-Fernandez, J. (2013) Behavioral Evaluation of Eight Rat Lines Selected for High and Low Anxiety-Related Responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 257, 39-48.

[20]   Wierońska, J.M., Smialowska, M., Brański, P., Gasparini, F., Klodzińska, A., Szewczyk, B., Palucha, A., Chojnacka-Wójcik, E. and Pilc A. (2004) In the Amygdala Anxiolytic Action of mGlu5 Receptors Antagonist MPEP Involves Neuropeptide Y but Not GABAA Signaling. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 514-521.