OJS  Vol.4 No.2 , February 2014
Acute-to-Chronic Ratio as a Metric for HIV Surveillance
Abstract: Early diagnosis is important for HIV control on both the individual and the population level. Patients who are diagnosed shortly after infection have more treatment options which can result in delayed progression to AIDS. Early diagnosis can also help to reduce the spread of HIV: with viral loads at the highest level, the newly infected have the highest risk of transmitting HIV to partners. Accordingly it is important to evaluate at a population level whether individuals are diagnosed shortly after infection. For this purpose, we introduce the acute-tochronic ratio, which is the odds of the infected individuals being diagnosed in the acute infection stage versus the chronic infection stage among those who seek HIV testing. We demonstrate this new metric through HIV testing results from sexually transmitted disease clinics of four cities, and compare the four populations with respect to how quickly the infected get HIV testing.
Cite this paper: Z. Hu and D. Follmann, "Acute-to-Chronic Ratio as a Metric for HIV Surveillance," Open Journal of Statistics, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2014, pp. 111-117. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2014.42011.

[1]   C. D. Pilcher, M. A. Price, I. F. Hoffman, S. Galvin, F. E. Martinson and P. N. Kazembe, et al., “Frequent Detection of Acute Primary HIV Infection in Men in Malawi,” AIDS, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2004, pp. 517-524.

[2]   UNAIDS, “HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing: A Gateway to Prevention and Care,” Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, 2002.

[3]   C. D. Pilcher, J. J. Eron, P. L. Vemazza, M. Battegay, T. Harr and S. Yerly, “Sexual Transmission during the Incubation Period of Primary HIV Infection,” Journal of American Medical Association, Vol. 286, No. 14, 2001, pp. 1713-1714.

[4]   T. Flanigan and K. T. Tashima, “Diagnosis of Acute HIV Infection: It’s Time to Get Moving,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 134, No. 1, 2001, pp. 75-77.

[5]   R. Brookmeyer and T. C. Quinn, “Estimation of Current Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence Rates From a Cross-Sectional Survey Using Diagnosis Tests,” American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 141, No. 2, 1995, pp. 166-172.

[6]   C. D. Pilcher, S. A. Fiscus, T. Q. Nguyen, E. Foust, L. Wolf and D. Williams, “Detection of Acute Infections during HIV Testing in North Carolina,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 352, No. 18, 2005, pp. 1873-1883.

[7]   J. D. Klausner, R. M. Grant and C. K. Kent, “Detection of Acute HIV Infections,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 6, 2005, pp. 631-633.

[8]   A. M. Shahkolahi and P. Chiliade, “Early Diagnosis of HIV Infection at Whitman Walker Clinic STD Program Using NAATs on Pooled Blood Samples,” National STD Prevention Conference, 9 May 2006.

[9]   S. Lindback, R. Thorstensson, A. C. Karlsson, M. Von Sydow, L. Falmholc and A. Blaxhult, “Diagnosis of Primary HIV-1 Infection and Duration of Follow-Up After HIV Exposure,” AIDS, Vol. 14, 2000, pp. 2333-2339.

[10]   E. W. Fiebig, D. J. Wright, B. D. Rawal, P. E. Garret, R. T. Schumacher and L. Peddada, “Dynamics of HIV Viremia and Antibody Seroconversion in Plasma Donors: Implications for Diagnosis and Staging of Primary HIV Infection,” AIDS, Vol. 17, No. 13, 2003, pp. 1871-1879.

[11]   T. A. Schacker, C. Collier, J. Hughes, T. Shea and L. Corey, “Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Primary HIV Infection,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 125, No. 4, 1996, pp. 257-264.