JBiSE  Vol.7 No.3 , February 2014
Current status of bioartificial kidney
Author(s) Sung Joon Shin
ABSTRACT

Current dialysis systems are not perfect considering the low efficacy and cumbersome process of actual practice. To overcome these shortcomings, bioartificial kidneys using renal tubule cells and wearable dialysis are promising ESRD treatments available in the near future. Toward clinical application, however, there are so many obstacles for commercial use of them. In this review, current status of bioartificial kidneys such as the renal tubule cell assist device (RAD) and wearable dialysis devices is presented with the comparison to show the advantages and disadvantages.


Cite this paper
Shin, S. (2014) Current status of bioartificial kidney. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7, 108-111. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2014.73014.
References
[1]   Kim, J.C. and Ronco, C. (2013) Personal daily dialysis: The evolution of the artificial kidney. Blood Purification, 36, 47-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000350586

[2]   Tumlin, J., Wali, R., Williams, W., et al. (2008) Efficacy and safety of renal tubule cell therapy for acute renal failure. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 19, 1034-1040.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2007080895

[3]   Buffington, D.A., Westover, A.J., Johnston, K.A. and Humes, H.D. (2013) The bioartificial kidney. Translational Research: The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2013.10.006

[4]   Narayanan, K., Schumacher, K.M., Tasnim, F. and Kandasamy, K., et al. (2013) Human embryonic stem cells differentiate into functional renal proximal tubular-like cells. Kidney International, 83, 593-603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.442

[5]   Mehrotra, R. and Himmelfarb, J. (2013) Dialysis in 2012: Could longer and more frequent haemodialysis improve outcomes? Nature Reviews. Nephrology, 9, 74-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.287

[6]   Wheeler, D.C. and Caplin, B. (2012) New observational data demonstrate that mortality is lower in patients receiving more frequent dialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 23, 770-773.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012030311

[7]   Kim, J.C., Garzotto, F., Nalesso, F. and Cruz, D., et al. (2011) A wearable artificial kidney: Technical requirements and potential solutions. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 8, 567-579.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.33

[8]   Kim, J.C. and Ronco, C. (2011) Current technological approaches for a wearable artificial kidney. Contributions to Nephrology, 171, 231-236.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327335

[9]   Davenport, A., Ronco, C. and Gura, V. (2011) From wearable ultrafiltration device to wearable artificial kidney. Contributions to Nephrology, 171, 237-242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327172

[10]   Davenport, A., Ronco, C. and Gura, V. (2010) Portable and wearable dialysis: Where are we now? Hemodialysis International. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 14, S22-S26.

[11]   Gura, V., Ronco, C., Nalesso, F. and Brendolan, A., et al. (2008) A wearable hemofilter for continuous ambulatory ultrafiltration. Kidney International, 73, 497-502.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002711

[12]   Davenport, A., Ronco, C., Gura, V. and Beizai, M., et al. (2007) A wearable haemodialysis device for patients with end-stage renal failure: A pilot study. Lancet, 370, 2005-2010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61864-9

[13]   Ronco, C. and Fecondini, L. (2007) The vicenza wearable artificial kidney for peritoneal dialysis (viwak pd). Blood Purif, 25, 383-388.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000107775

[14]   Ronco, C., Davenport, A. and Gura, V. (2011) The future of the artificial kidney: Moving towards wearable and miniaturized devices. Nefrologia, 31, 9-16.

[15]   Lee, D.B. and Roberts, M. (2008) A peritoneal-based automated wearable artificial kidney. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 12, 171-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10157-008-0050-9

[16]   Polaschegg, H.D. (2011) Wearable dialysis: What is missing? Contributions to Nephrology, 171, 226-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327231

 
 
Top