CN  Vol.6 No.1 , February 2014
Deployment of the Content-Based Switching Network
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a hybrid network architecture, called Content-based Switching Network (CSN), and its signaling scheme, which addresses the issues inherent to conventional hybrid networks which implement a horizontal separation over the entire network (from edge to edge). We will show how CSN nodes can flexibly choose their switching paradigm (store-and-forward, optical bypass, electrical bypass) during a path establishment. Contents being transferred in one piece from end-to-end, the concept of packet can be eluded in our network, and, in particular, the user is able to avoid complicated transport layer functions, like TCP, if they are not essential. In CSN, very large contents have a special status, since they cannot be store-and-forwarded. We will show how the resource management has been designed in order to deal with such contents. A section is dedicated to deployment and feasibility issues. Simulation results will show that CSN can successfully transfer contents at 1 Gbps and 10 Gbps, the maximum speed being limited by the state-of-the-art device technologies when buffering is required (memory speed), while no major limit is observed in the case of all-optical transfers other than the optical fiber speed. Other results concern the deployment of CSN from an unclean slate approach. They will show how beneficial can be the deployment of CSN from an Optical Circuit Switching network.
Cite this paper: C. Michard, Y. Tanigawa and H. Tode, "Deployment of the Content-Based Switching Network," Communications and Network, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2014, pp. 29-42. doi: 10.4236/cn.2014.61005.

[1]   Alcatel-Lucent, “Video Shakes up the IP Edge—A Bell Labs Study on Rising Video Demand and its Impact on Broadband IP Networks,” Strategic White Paper, 2012. Resource_Ctr&LMSG_CONTENT_FILE=White_Papers/Video_Shakes_Up_IP_Edge_EN_Whitepaper.pdf

[2]   K. J. Barker, A. Benner, R. Hoare, A. Hoisie, A. K. Jones, D. K. Kerbyson, et al., “On the Feasibility of Optical Circuit Switching for High Performance Computing Systems,” Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, 2005, pp. 16-38.

[3]   L. Xu, H. G. Perros and G. Rouskas, “Techniques for Optical Packet Switching and Optical Burst Switching,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2001, pp. 136-142.

[4]   T. Miyazawa, H. Furukawa, K. Fujikawa, N. Wada and H. Harai, “Development of an Autonomous Distributed Control System for Optical Packet and Circuit Integrated Networks,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012, pp. 25-37.

[5]   T. Miyazawa, H. Furukawa, H. Harai and N. Wada, “Proposal and Implementation of an Autonomous Distributed Control for Elimination of Incomplete Lightpaths in Optical Packet and Circuit Integrated Networks,” 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling, Colchester, 17-20 April 2012, pp. 1-6.

[6]   X. Wu, M. C. Chan, A. L. Ananda and C. Ganjihal, “Sync-TCP: A New Approach to High Speed Congestion Control,” 17th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, Princeton, 13-16 October 2009, pp. 181-192.

[7]   C. Ganjihal, “Experimental Evaluation of Sync-TCP and Other Highspeed Congestion Control Algorithms,” Master’s Thesis, National University of Singapore, 2009.

[8]   Y. Chen, C. Qiao and X. Yu, “Optical Burst Switching (OBS): A New Area in Optical Networking Research,” IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2004, pp. 16-23.

[9]   A. Passarella, “Review: A Survey on Content-Centric Technologies for the Current Internet: CDN and P2P Solutions,” Computer Communications, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-32.

[10]   K. Kitayama, A. Shinya, S. Matsuo, R. Takahashi, M. Murata and S. Arakawa, “Optical RAM Buffer for AllOptical Packet Switches,” Asia Communications and Photonics Conference and Exhibition, Shanghai, 2-6 November 2009, pp. 5-6.

[11]   S. Das, G. Parulkar and N. McKeown, “Unifying Packet and Circuit Switched Networks,” IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops, Honolulu, 30 November-4 December 2009, pp. 1-6.

[12]   V. R. Gudla, S. Das, A. Shastri, G. Parulkar, N. Mckeown, L. Kazovsky and S. Yamashita, “Experimental Demonstration of Open Flow Control of Packet and Circuit Switches,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference, San Diego, 21-25 March 2010, pp. 1-3.

[13]   S. Das, “pac.c: A Unified Control Architecture for Packet and Circuit Network Convergence,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2012.

[14]   N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker and J. Turner, “Open Flow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, pp. 69-74.

[15]   V. Jacobson, D. K. Smetters, J. D. Thornton, M. F. Plass, N. H. Briggs and R. L. Braynard, “Networking Named Content,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, 1 December 2009, pp. 1-12.

[16]   Cisco Carrier Routing System, “Compare Models,” 2006.

[17]   A. Chakrapani, “QDR SRAM and RLDRAM: A Comparative Analysis,” White Paper, Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 2010.

[18]   OMNeT++ Network Simulation Framework.

[19]   E. Weingärtner, H. vom Lehn and K. Wehrle, “A Performance Comparison of Recent Network Simulators,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Dresden, 14-18 June 2009, pp. 1-5.

[20]   S. D. Maesschalck, D. Colle, I. Lievens, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, C. Mauz, et al., “Pan-European Optical Transport Networks: An Availability-Based Comparison,” Photonic Network Communications, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2003, pp. 203-225.