Health  Vol.6 No.3 , February 2014
A disregard for calories during sampling: Exploring the “samples don’t count” effect
Abstract: Product sampling is an important part of food retailing promotion. We explore how food sampling affects individuals’ total caloric estimates of a consumption episode. In a field study, at a small self-serve frozen yogurt store, 144 participants were randomly assigned to either a control or samples’ condition. Analysis of variance showed that individuals who had no or one sample overestimated the number of calories they were consuming, while those who had two or more samples underestimated their caloric intake.
Cite this paper: Martins, C. , Block, L. and Dahl, D. (2014) A disregard for calories during sampling: Exploring the “samples don’t count” effect. Health, 6, 218-222. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.63032.

[1]   CDC (2010)

[2]   Grieve, F.G. and Vander Weq, M.W. (2003) Desire to eat high- and low-fat foods following a low-fat dietary inter-vention. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 35, 98-104.

[3]   Chernev, A. and Gal, D. (2010) Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 738-747.

[4]   Chandon, P. and Wansink, B. (2007) Is obesity caused by calorie underestimation? A psychophysical model of meal size estimation. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 84-99.

[5]   Chernev, A. and Chandon, P. (2010) Calorie estimation biases in consumer choice. In: Batra, R., Keller P. and Strecher, V., Eds., Leveraging Consumer Psychology for Effective Health Communications: The Obesity Challenge, M.E.Sharpe, Inc., Armonk.

[6]   Geier, A.B., Rozin, P. and Doros, G. (2006) Unit bias: A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psychological Science, 17, 523-525.

[7]   Wansink, B. and Chandon, P. (2006) Can “Low-Fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 605-617.

[8]   Chernev, A. (2011). The dieter’s paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 178-183.

[9]   Irmak, C., Vallen, B. and Robinson, S.R. (2011) The impact of product name on dieters’ and nondieters’ food evaluations and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 390-405.

[10]   Rozin, P., Ashmore, M.B. and Markwith, M. (1996) Lay American conceptions of nutrition: Dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. Health Psychology, 15, 438-447.

[11]   Mishra, A., Mishra, H. and Nayakankuppam, D. (2009) The group contagion effect: The influence of spatial groupings on perceived contagion and preferences. Psychological Science, 20, 867-870.

[12]   Archer E., Hand, G.A. and Blair, S.N. (2013) Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination survey caloric energy intake data, 1971-2010. PLoS ONE, 8, Article ID: e76632.

[13]   York, E.B. (2008) Sampling: The new mass medium. Advertising Age, 79, 3-56.

[14]   Scott, M.L., Nowlis, S.M., Mandel, N. and Morales, A.C. (2008) The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 391-405.

[15]   Holmstrup, M.E., Stearns-Bruening, K. and Rozelle, J. (2012) Quantifying accurate calorie estimation using the “think aloud” method. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45, 77-81.

[16]   Van Kleef, E., Shimizu, M. and Wansink, B. (2011) Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 44, 66-70.