IJMPCERO  Vol.3 No.1 , February 2014
Experience of a Videoconference System with Medical Information Desktop Sharing for Radiation Therapy and Evaluation of Its Usefulness
ABSTRACT

Purpose: To present our videoconference system with medical information desktop sharing for radiation therapy and report initial experience using the system and its usefulness. Materials and Methods: A videoconference system for radiation therapy enables radiation oncologists sent to affiliated hospitals to consult a more experienced board-certified doctor at our institution while sharing the same display showing a patient’s information, radiology information system (RIS), and radiation therapy planning (RTP) system. We evaluated cases discussed in videoconferences to determine the influence of the system on treatment policies and radiation therapy plans. Results: From December 2012 to March 2013, treatment policies for 56 cases and radiation therapy plans for 50 cases were discussed in videoconferences. As for treatment policies, no change was made in treatment policy for 33 cases (59%), and minor and major changes were made for 16 (29%) cases and 7 (12%) cases, respectively. Radiation therapy plans for 50 cases were checked. No change was needed for 32 cases (64%), and minor and major changes were needed for 17 (34%) cases and 1 (2%) case, respectively. Conclusion: The videoconference system can be effective for improving the quality of radiation therapy.


Cite this paper
S. Kawashiro, Y. Hagiwara, I. Ota, M. Ichikawa, M. Miwa, Y. Kuroda and K. Nemoto, "Experience of a Videoconference System with Medical Information Desktop Sharing for Radiation Therapy and Evaluation of Its Usefulness," International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 20-24. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.31004.
References
[1]   H. Numasaki, M. Nishio, H. Ikeda, K. Sekiguchi, N. Kamikonya, M. Koizumi, et al., “Japanese Structure Survey of Radiation Oncology in 2009 with Special Reference to Designated Cancer Care Hospitals,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2013, pp. 775-783.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0468-7

[2]   Y. Ogawa, K. Nemoto, Y. Kakuto, H. Seiji, K. Sakaki, C. Takahashi, et al., “Construction of a Remote Radiotherapy Planning System,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2005, pp. 26-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-004-0446-9

[3]   D. R. Olsen, S. Bruland and B. J. Davis, “Telemedicine in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Requirements and Applications,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2000, pp. 255-259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00185-1

[4]   K. Suzuki, Y. Hirasawa, Y. Yaegashi, H. Miyamoto and H. Shirato, “A Web-Based Remote Radiation Treatment Planning System Using the Remote Desktop Function of a Computer Operating System: A Preliminary Report,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2009, pp. 414-418.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090409

[5]   P. D. Maguire, G. Honaker, C Neal, M. Meyerson, D. Morris, J. Rosenman, et al., “A Bridge between Academic and Community Radiation Oncology Treatment Planning,” Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2007, pp. 238-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.0752001

[6]   S. Agrawal, A. K. Maurya, K. Shrivastava, S. Kumar, M. C. Pant and S. K. Mishra, “Training the Trainees in Radiation Oncology with Telemedicine as a Tool in a Developing Country: A Two-Year Audit,” International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, Vol. 2011, 2011, Article ID: 230670.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/230670

[7]   T. N. Teslow, R. A. Gilbert, W. H. Grant III, S. Y. Woo, E. B. Butler and J. H. Liem, “A Teleradiology Case Conference System,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1995, pp. 95-99.

[8]   K. H. Lee, J. Y. Kim, K. Lee, B. Cho, J. H. Yang, E. Goh, et al., “Implementation of a Videoconferencing System between Family Medicine Departments,” Korean Journal of Family Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2011, pp. 311-316.

 
 
Top