AS  Vol.5 No.2 , February 2014
Dynamic modeling of mineral contents in greenhouse tomato crop

Tomato is one the most important vegetables worldwide and mineral nutrition in tomato crops is considered as the second most important factor in crop management after water availability. Mathematical modeling techniques allow us to design strategies for nutrition management. In order to generate the necessary information to validate and calibrate a dynamic growth model, two tomato crop cycles were developed. Several mineral analyses were performed during crop development to determine the behavior of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S in different organs of the plant. Regression models were generated to mimic the behavior of minerals in tomato plants and they were included in the model in order to simulate their dynamic behavior. The results of this experiments showed that the growth model adequately simulates leaf and fruit weight (EF > 0.95 and Index > 0.95). As for harvested fruits and harvested leaves, the simulation was less efficient (EF < 0.90 and Index < 0.90). Simulation of minerals was suitable for N, P, K and S as both, the EF and the Index, had higher values than 0.95. In the case of Ca and Mg, simulations showed indices below 0.90. These models can be used for planning crop management and to design more appropriate fertilization strategies.

Cite this paper: Juárez-Maldonado, A. , Benavides-Mendoza, A. , de-Alba-Romenus, K. and Morales-Díaz, A. (2014) Dynamic modeling of mineral contents in greenhouse tomato crop. Agricultural Sciences, 5, 114-123. doi: 10.4236/as.2014.52015.

[1]   Martínez-Ruiz, A., López-Cruz, I.L., Ruiz-García, A. and Ramírez-Arias, A. (2012) Calibración y validación de un modelo de transpiración para gestión de riegos de jitomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) en invernadero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 4, 757-766.

[2]   SAGARPA (2013) Agricultura protegida 2012.

[3]   Sepat, N.K., Kumar, A., Yadav, J. and Srivastava, R.B. (2012) Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of tomato in trans Himalayan. Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 14, 120-123.

[4]   Gad, N. and Hassan, N.M.K. (2013) Role of cobalt and organic fertilizers amendments on tomato production in the newly reclaimed soil. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22, 1527-1533.

[5]   Mehdizadeh, M., Darbandi, E.I., Naseri-Rad, H. and Tobeh, H. (2013) Growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced by different organic fertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4, 734-738.

[6]   Shalaby, T.A. and El-Banna, A. (2013) Molecular and horticultural characteristics of in vitro induced tomato mutants. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, 155-163.

[7]   MéXICOPRODUCE (2013) Productos: Jitomate.

[8]   Quesada-Roldán, G. and Bertsh-Hernández, F. (2013) Obtaining of the absorption curve for the fb-17 tomato hybrid. Terra Latinoamericana, 31, 1-7.

[9]   Bugarín-Montoya, R., Galvis-Spinola, A., Sánchez-García, P. and García-Paredes, D. (2002) Daily accumulation of aboveground dry matter and potassium in tomato. Terra Latinoamericana, 20, 401-409.

[10]   Enriquez-Reyes, S.A., Alcántar-González, G., Castellanos-Ramos, J.Z., Suárez, E.A., González-Eguiarte, D. and Lazcano-Ferrat I. (2003) NUMAC-N Tomato: Mineral nutrition fit at growth. The nitrogen nutrition in tomato greenhouse production. 1. Model description and parameters adjust. Terra Latinoamericana, 21, 167-175.

[11]   Basheer, M. and Agrawal, O.P. (2013) Effect of vermicompost on the growth and productivity of tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum) under field conditions. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 4, 247-249.

[12]   Zhang, J. and Wang, S. (2011) Simulation of the canopy photosynthesis model of greenhouse tomato. Procedia Engineering, 16, 632-639.

[13]   Marcelis, L.F.M., Elings, A., Bakker, M.J., Brajeul, E., Dieleman, J.A., de Visser, P.H.B. and Heuvelink, E. (2006) Modelling dry matter production and partitioning in sweet pepper. Acta Horticulturae, 718, 121-128.

[14]   Gary, C. (1999) Modeling greenhouse crops: State of the art and perspectives. Acta Horticulturae, 495, 317-322.

[15]   De Gelder, A., Heuvelink, E. and Opdam, J.J.G. (2005) Tomato yield in a closed greenhouse and comparison with simulated yields in closed and conventional greenhouses. Acta Horticulturae, 691, 549-552.

[16]   Marcelis, L.F.M., Elings, A., de Visser, P.H.B. and Heuvelink, E. (2009) Simulating growth and development of tomato crop. Acta Horticulturae, 821, 101-110.

[17]   Massa, D., Incrocci, L., Maggini, R., Bibbiani, C., Carmassi, G., Malorgio, F. and Pardossi, A. (2011) Simulation of crop water and mineral relations in greenhouse soilless culture. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26, 711-722.

[18]   Steiner, A.A. (1961) A universal method for preparing nutrient solutions of a certain desired composition. Plant Soil, 15, 134-154.

[19]   Tap, R.F. (2000) Economics-based optimal control of greenhouse tomato crop production. Ph.D. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.

[20]   Wallach, D. (2006) Evaluating crop models. In: Wallach, D., Makowski, D. and Jones, J.W., Eds., Working with Dynamic Crop Models. Evaluation, Analysis, Parameterization and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 11-54.

[21]   Marcelis, L.F.M., Brajeul, E., Elings, A., Garate, A. and Heuvelink, E. (2005) Modelling nutrient uptake of sweet pepper. Acta Horticulturae, 691, 285-292.

[22]   Orman, S. (2012) Effects of elemental sulphur and farmyard manure applications to calcareous saline clay loam soil on growth and some nutrient concentrations of tomato plants. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10, 720-725.