AJPS  Vol.5 No.2 , January 2014
Comparative Yeild and Oil Quality of Toxic and Non-Toxic Mexican Jatropha curcas Grown in the Same Agroclimatic Conditions
Abstract: Jatropha curcas brings attention across the developing world for biodiesel production since it grows in tropical and subtropical climates with no other competing food uses. This crop is gaining popularity in Mexico for biofuel production. Currently, there are not many reports on the native varieties and their yield to estimate the feasibility of the particular genetic resource to use it as an economic crop. So in this part of work an agronomical evaluation of yield, oil content, fatty acid types and biodiesel conversion from the two native varieties of Jatropha curcas from Mexico were compared while being produced in the same agro-climatic condition. The varieties used were based on the phorbol ester content like toxic and nontoxic varieties collected from Yucatan and Veracruz. It was found that the oil content in the seeds of toxic variety was 57% and oil content of the nontoxic variety was 54% and also the seed yield is higher. The fatty acid content also varies among the two varieties like 21% and 23% in toxic and nontoxic varieties respectively. Again in the nontoxic variety the content of monosaturated fatty acid was higher, which suggests that better quality biodiesel may be expected from this genotype. Transestrification of the two kinds of oil was done using KOH as a catalyst, but no significant difference was observed in the conversion of biodiesel among the two types of oil from the two genotypes.
Cite this paper: K. Sanghamitra, R. Oramas and R. Prasad, "Comparative Yeild and Oil Quality of Toxic and Non-Toxic Mexican Jatropha curcas Grown in the Same Agroclimatic Conditions," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2014, pp. 230-234. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.52030.

[1]   K. Pramanik, “Properties and Use of Jatropha curcas Oil and Diesel Fuel Blends in Compression Ignition Engine,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2003, pp. 239-248.

[2]   K. Bozbas, “Biodiesel as an Alternative Motor Fuel: Production and Policies in the European Union,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2008, pp. 542-552.

[3]   K. Openshaw, “A Review of Jatropha curcas: An Oil Plant of Unfulfilled Promise,” Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-15.

[4]   J. Martínez-Herrera, et al., “Chemical Composition, Toxic/Antimetabolic Constituents, and Effects of Different Treatments on Their Levels, in Four Provenances of Jatropha curcas L. from Mexico,” Food Chemistry, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2006, pp. 80-89.

[5]   R. K. Henning, “Understanding the Jatropha System,” In: International Consultation on Pro-Poor Jatropha Development, IFAD, Rome, 10-11 April 2008.

[6]   H. P. S. Makkar and K. Becker, “Jatropha curcas Toxicity: Identification of Toxic Principles,” In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Poisonous Plants, San Angelo, 19-23 May 1997.

[7]   H. P. S. Makkar, et al., “Comparative Evaluation of Non-Toxic and Toxic Varieties of Jatropha curcas for Chemical Composition, Digestibility, Protein Degradability and Toxic Factors,” Food Chemistry, Vol. 62, No. 2, 1998, pp. 207-215.

[8]   AOAC, “Official Methods of Analysis,” 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, 1990.

[9]   V. K. Gour, “Production Practices Including Post-Harvest Management of Jatropha curcas,” In: B. Singh, R. Swaminathan and V. Ponraj, Eds., Proceedings of the Biodiesel Conference toward Energy Independence—Focus of Jatropha, Hyderabad, 9-10 June 2006, pp. 223-251.

[10]   FACT, “Position Paper on Jatropha curcas L. State of the Art, Small and Large Scale Project Development,” Fuels from Agriculture in Communal Technology, 2007.