SM  Vol.4 No.1 , January 2014
Look Ma, We’re Still Theorizing: The Continued Search for Theoretical Integration
ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explore the often-fractured attempt at theoretical integration within contemporary sociological thought. Theoretical integration was a goal of the early pioneers of sociology but has since been discounted by many as unattainable idealistic vision. We challenge this virtually universal assessment. The belief that theoretical integration is beyond grasp has been owed to a number of debates within contemporary sociological thought, including but not limited to, those surrounding human nature and rationality. We conclude our paper with a proposal for a new direction forward and a hopeful starting place for a promising integrated sociological perspective.


Cite this paper
Waggoner, K. & Roark, E. (2014). Look Ma, We’re Still Theorizing: The Continued Search for Theoretical Integration. Sociology Mind, 4, 61-73. doi: 10.4236/sm.2014.41009.
References
[1]   Bailey, K. (1982). Methods of social research (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

[2]   Baldus, B. (1990). Positivism’s twilight? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 15, 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340748

[3]   Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

[4]   Bierstedt, R. (1974). Power and progress: Essays on sociological theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

[5]   Blalock, H. (1972). Social statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.

[6]   Blau, P. (1960). Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 25, 178-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092624

[7]   Broadhead, R. (1974). Notes on the sociology of the absurd: An undersocialized conception of man. The Pacific Sociological Review, 17, 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1388596

[8]   Cole, S. (1994). Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Sociological Forum, 9, 133-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01476359

[9]   Cole, S. (1995). Progress in the natural and social sciences: A reply to Wallace. Sociological Forum, 10, 319-323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02095965

[10]   Colignon, R. (1989). Reification: The holistic and individualis-tic views of organizations. Theory and Society, 9, 83-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160689

[11]   Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 86, 83-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227351

[12]   Collins, R. (1994). Why the social sciences won’t become high consensus rapid discovery. Science Sociological Forum, 9, 155-177.

[13]   Crow, W., & Knowles, R. (1960). The valid use of simulation results. Simulation and Society: An Exploration of Scientific Gaming. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

[14]   Davis, K. (1959). The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review, 24, 757-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2088563

[15]   Eckberg, D., & Hill, L. (1979). The paradigm concept and sociology: A critical review. American Sociology Review, 44, 925-937.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094717

[16]   Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Continuum Books.

[17]   Freund, J. (1968). The sociology of Max Weber. New York: Pantheon Books.

[18]   Gans, H. (1989). Sociology in America: The discipline and the public. American Sociological Association, 1988 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 54, 1-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095658

[19]   Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095141

[20]   Gouldner, A. (1962). Anti-minotaur: The myth of value free sociology. Social Problems, 9, 199-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/799230

[21]   Gouldner, A. (1971). Coming crisis of modern sociology. New York: Avon.

[22]   Hughes, S. (1958). Consciousness and society: The reorientation of European social thought, 1890-1930. New York: Vintage Books.

[23]   Kanazawa, S. (1998). In Defense of Unrealistic Assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16, 193-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00050

[24]   Kanazawa, S. (1995). The problem of order: What unites and divides society (review). The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1367-1369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230661

[25]   Kinloch, G. (1981). Ideology and contemporary sociological theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[26]   Kockelmans, J. (1979). Sociology and the problem of rationality. In Rationality Today (pp. 85-115). Ottowa: The University of Ottowa Press.

[27]   Lawler, E., Ridgeway, C., & Markovsky, B. (1993). Structural social psychology and the micro-macro problem. Sociological Theory, 11, 268-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/201971

[28]   March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

[29]   Markovsky, B. (1997). Evolution and nebulousness in theories. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2, 24-29.

[30]   Mayhew, B. (1980). Structuralism versus individualism: Part I, shadow boxing in the dark. Social Forces, 59, 335-375.

[31]   Mayhew, B. (1981). Structuralism versus individualism: Part II, ideological and other obfuscations. Social Forces, 59, 627-648.

[32]   Morris, M. (1977). An excursion into creative sociology. New York: Columbia University Press.

[33]   Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw Hill.

[34]   Perrow, C. (1981). Disintegrating social sciences. New York University Education Quarterly, 12, 2-9.

[35]   Psathas, G. (1972). Ethnomethods and phenomenology. In Symbolic Interaction (pp. 125-141). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[36]   Raser, J. (1968). Simulation and society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[37]   Risman, B. (2001). Calling the bluff of value-free science: Comments on Udry. American Sociological Review, 66, 605-611.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088926

[38]   Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[39]   Ritzer, G. (1981). Toward an integrated sociological paradigm: The search for an exemplar and an image of the subject matter. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[40]   Ritzer, G., Kammeyer, K., & Yetman, N. (1982). Sociology: Experiencing a changing society. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[41]   Sarte, J. (1947). Existentialism. New York: Carol Publishing Group.

[42]   Skidmore, W. (1979). Theoretical thinking in sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[43]   Sorokin, P. (1965). Sociology of yesterday, today, and tomorrow. American Sociological Review, 30, 833-843.

[44]   Stinchcombe, A. (1978). Theoretical methods and social history. New York: Academic Press.

[45]   Turk, H. (1965). An inquiry into the undersocialized conception of man. Social Forces, 43, 518-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2574458

[46]   Turner, J. (1989). The disintegration of American sociology: Pacific sociology association 1988 presidential address. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 419-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1389130

[47]   Turner, J. (1992). If not positivism, then why is sociology important. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 17, 54-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340589

[48]   Turner, J. (2003). The structure of sociological theory. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth Learning.

[49]   Turner, J., & Beeghley L. (1979). The emergence of sociological theory. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

[50]   Udry, R. (2001). Feminist critics uncover determine isn’t, positivism and antiquated theory. American Sociology Review, 66, 611-618.

[51]   Waggoner, K. (1983). Simulation survey techniques to assess consumer travel behavior under conditions of energy constraint: A phenomenological model of decision making. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa: Iowa State University.

[52]   Waggoner, K. (1993). Professional ethics, a methodology for decision making: Expert systems in the classroom. National Student Speech Language Hearing Association Journal, 20, 112-121.

[53]   Wallace, W. (1969). Sociological theory: An introduction. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

[54]   Wallace, W. (1995). Why sociology does not make progress. Sociological Forum, 10, 313-318.

[55]   Watkins, B., & Meador, R. (1979). Technology and human values: Collision/Solution. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.

[56]   Weber, M. (1949). Objectivity in social science and social policy. In, The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

[57]   Weick, K. (1974). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.

[58]   Weirich, P. (2004). Realistic decision theory: Rules for non-ideal agents in non-ideal circumstances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019517125X.001.0001

[59]   Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern society. American Sociological Review, 26, 183-193.

[60]   Zeitlan, I. (1973). Rethinking sociology: A critique of contemporary theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

 
 
Top