Generally the community describesthe “cultural heritage” such as historic, artistic, scientific and traditional. These definitions often coincide with the attribution of “value” and “identity”. Many answers about what could “cultural heritage” be are explained as a set together with their specific value, such as landscape and architecture of high artistic value and historic materials of scientific value. In contrast it is not possible to rely on this generality of definitions. The reality shows that the definition of value of “cultural heritage” changes in relation to the person, culture, geography, social and economic conditions. In other words, in relation to the person, the standpoint of value of “cultural heritage” is different according to each category, such as ruins, works of art, historic cities and gardens, and it is rare that one category simultaneously holds many of such values. It is believed that there are no words or phrases that comprehensively explain the various values that prescribe “cultural heritage”. Therefore in defining “cultural heritage” its values not must be specifically expressed as historic, artistic, scientific and others, but should be left in a way that can correspond also to the concept of a “cultural heritage” the significance of identity and of inheritance. Define the value of cultural heritage means to analyze the identity of the site and its contents of inheritance. The concepts of value and inheritance analyzed here are not related to economic considerations. Differently these concepts are analyzed with reference to scientific theories of A.K. Sen, M. W. Feldman and L. Cavalli-Sforza. In fact this paper proposes a reflection on these concepts with the support of interdisciplinary studies.
Niglio, O. (2014) Inheritance and Identity of Cultural Heritage. Advances in Literary Study, 2, 1-4. doi: 10.4236/als.2014.21001.
[1] Arcomano, V. (2010). L’idea di cultura nella tradizione pedagogica. In Cqia Rivista issue no. 1, November 2010 (pp. 50-62). Bergamo: Università degli Studi di Bergamo. [2] Carter, I. (2001). L’idea di eguaglianza (pp. 7-22). Milan: Feltrinelli. [3] Cavalli Sforza, L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [4] Facchini, F. (2006). Origini dell’uomo ed evoluzione culturale. Milan: Jaca Book. [5] Heidegger, M. (2007). Saggi e discorsi. Milan: Mursia. [6] Niglio, O. (2012a). Sul concetto di Valore per il patrimonio culturale, In O. Niglio (Ed.), Paisaje cultural urbano e identitad territorial. In Proceedings 2° Coloquio Red Internacional de pensamiento crítico sobre globalización y patrimonio construido (pp. 23-38). Roma: Aracne. [7] Niglio, O. (2012b). Cultural Petition on the Preservation Project. In S. Giometti, W. Lipp, B. Szmygin, & J. ?tulc (Eds.), Conservation Turn —Return to Conservation. Tolerance for Change, Limits of Change: Proceedings of the International Conferences of the Icomos Interna. Florence: Edizioni Polistampa. [8] Niglio, O. (2012c). Le Carte del Restauro. Documenti e Norme per la Conservazione dei Beni Architettonici ed Ambientali. Rome, Aracne. [9] Sen, A. K. (1994). Equality of What? In Inequality Reexamined (pp. 29-52). Bologna: Il Mulino. [10] Sen, A. K. (2006a). Scelta, benessere, equità. Bologna: Il Mulino. [11] Sen, A. K. (2006b). Identità e violenza. Rome-Bari: Laterza. [12] UNESCO (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. [13] UNESCO (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions.