IJOHNS  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2014
Microdrill, Diode Laser, and Manual Microsurgical Stapedoplasty: A Comparative Study
ABSTRACT

Background: To evaluate hearing outcome, operation time and post-operative hospital stay after primary stapedoplasty with three different techniques: manual microsurgical, microdrill-assisted, and microdrill- and laser-assisted technique. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive cases of primary otosclerosis was operated by one surgeon. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the utilized surgical techniques: a fully manual microsurgical stapedoplasty (n = 56), microdrill-assisted stapedoplasty (n = 32), and microdrill- and laser-assisted stapedoplasty (n = 62). The mean pre- and post-operative air-bone gap was calculated by using pre- and post-operative mean pure tone air- and bone-conduction thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the hearing outcome between the groups. The closure of air-bone gap and the improvement of the hearing were demonstrated in all study groups. Introduction of diode laser for stapes surgery resulted in significantly reduced operation time (about one-third) and the increase in the completion of surgery from 81.5% to 96.7%. At the same time, the rate of complications stayed low and hospital stay dropped from three days to one day. There were no major post-operative complications in any study groups. Conclusions: Application of diode laser in stapes surgery significantly reduced operation time and increased completion rate of surgery. No statistically significant difference was found between three surgical techniques regarding hearing outcome.


Cite this paper
P. Kasenõmm and M. Suurna, "Microdrill, Diode Laser, and Manual Microsurgical Stapedoplasty: A Comparative Study," International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 4-8. doi: 10.4236/ijohns.2014.31002.
References
[1]   J. J. Shea, “Fenestration of the Oval Window,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, Vol. 67, No. 4, 1958, pp. 932-951.

[2]   R. C. Perkins, “Laser Stapedotomy for Otosclerosis,” Laryngoscope, Vol. 90, No. 2, 1980, pp. 228-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198002000-00007

[3]   S. G. Lesinski and A. Palmer, “Lasers for Otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532,” Laryngoscope, Vol. 99, Suppl. 46, 1989, pp. 1-8.

[4]   T. M. McGee, “The Argon Laser in Surgery for Chronic ear Disease and Otosclerosis,” Laryngoscope, Vol. 93, No. 9, 1983, pp. 1177-1182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198309000-00014

[5]   M. Gjuric, “Microdrill versus Perforator for Stapedotomy,” Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1990, pp. 411-413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1990.tb00492.x

[6]   J. D. Sedwick, C. L. Louden and C. Shelton, “Stapedectomy vs Stapedotomy. Do You Really Need a Laser?” Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 123, No. 2, 1997, pp. 177-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900020059008

[7]   T. Somers, J. P. Vercruysse, A. Zarowski, M. Verstreken and E. Offeciers, “Stapedotomy with Microdrill or Carbon Dioxide Laser: Influence on Inner Ear Function,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, Vol. 115, No. 12, 2006, pp. 880-885.

[8]   C. Brace, I. Keil, J. Schwitulla, K. Mantsopoulos, M. Schmid, H. Iro and J. Hornung, “Bone Conduction after Stapes Surgery: Comparison of CO2 Laser and Manual Perforator,” Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2013, pp. 821-826.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318280dc78

[9]   H. Yavuz, F. Caylakli, F. Ozer and L. N. Ozluoglu, “Reliability of Microdrill Stapedotomy: Comparison with Pick Stapedotomy,” Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2007, pp. 998-1001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31815a3548

[10]   D. Cuda, A. Murri, P. Morchi, T. Solenghi and N. Tinelli, “Microdrill, CO2-Laser, and Piezoelectric Stapedotomy: A Comparative Study,” Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1111-1115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b76b08

[11]   T. Palva, “Argon Laser in Otosclerosis Surgery,” Acta Oto-laryngologica, Vol. 104, No. 1-2, 1987, pp. 153-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016488709109061

[12]   D. L. Rothbaum, J. Roy, G. D. Hager, R. H. Taylor, L. L. Whitcomb, H. W. Francis and J. K. Niparko, “Task Performance in Stapedectomy: Comparison between Surgeons of Different Experience Levels,” Otolaryngology— Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 128, No. 1, 2003, pp. 71-77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2003.13

[13]   S. B. Mathews, B. M. Rasgon and F. M. Byl, “Stapes Surgery in a Residency Training Program,” Laryngoscope, Vol. 109, No. 1, 1999, pp. 52-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199901000-00011

[14]   C. A. Mangham Jr., “Reducing Footplate Complications in Small Fenestra Microdrill Stapedotomy,” American Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1993, pp. 118-121.

[15]   R. Vincent, A. J. Bittermann, J. Oates, N. Sperling and W. Grolman, “KTP versus CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy for Primary Otosclerosis: Results of a New Comparative Series with the Otology-Neurotology Database,” Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2012, pp. 928-933.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f24ff

[16]   G. D. L. Smyth, “Immediate and Delayed Alterations in Cochlear Function Following Stapedotomy,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1978, pp. 105-112.

 
 
Top