ABSTRACT This paper used the Game Theory to research how to coordinate a kind of supply chain, which is made up of a dominant manufacturer, a TPL supplier and some retailers. It also discussed the node enterprises’ decision models in three situations: no coordination, partly coordination and all coordination based on symmetric information and proved system’s profit was optimal in the situation of all coordination. And then some ways of profit distribution were laid out. Finally, verified the validity of the models and ways of profit distribution through examples.
Cite this paper
nullY. Liang, X. Zuo and H. Lei, "Research on Supply Chain Coordination of TPL Supplier Participation," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2011.41001.
 A. Vining and S. Globerman, “A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Outsourcing Decision,” European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1999, pp. 183-198.
 D. L. Yang and Y. Jiang, “Quantitative Research on the Collaboration between Node Enterprise and Third Party Logistics under SCM,” China Soft Science, Vol. 3, 2002, pp. 1-5.
 Y. Y. Zheng, “Study on the Cooperation Relationship between Third Party Logistics and Vendor under Supply Chain,” Qing Dao University, 2005.
 S. Huang and B. Y. Li, “The Coordination of the Third Party Logistics Based on Revenue Sharing,” Businuess Economies, Vol. 11, 2008, pp. 5-8.
 B. Dan, Q. Wu, X. M. Zhang and J. Xiao, “Shared-Savings Contracts between a Third Party Logistics Service Provider and a Client Enterprise,” System Engineering-Theory and Practice, Vol. 2, 2007, pp. 46-53.
 Y. D. Gong, B. Y. Li and T. Liu, “The Pricing and Coordination Policies of Three-echelon Supply Chain,” Price Monthly, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. 12-14.
 F. Ye and Y. N. Li, “The Motivation Mechanism of Three- echelon Supply Chain Cooperation,” Journal of System Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2007, pp. 130-134.