Back
 OJO  Vol.4 No.1 , January 2014
PFC Sigma Cobalt-Chrome Total Knee Replacement: Early Outcomes Demonstrate No Significant Early Failures at the Three-Year Mark
Abstract: The PFC Sigma Cobalt Chrome Sigma (PFCSCC) was introduced in 2006, and represents further development of the PFC Sigma design aiming at reducing the problem of backside wear. To ensure that there were no significant early failures following the introduction of this knee system to our hospital in 2006, we prospectively identified all patients undergoing TKA with the PFCSCC over a one-year period. Clinical and demographic patient data, American Knee Society scores, Oxford Knee scores, SF-12 scores and radiographic data were recorded preoperatively and at three-year post surgery. 233 patients underwent 249 primary knee arthroplasties with the PFCSCC. Seven patients (eight TKAs) died before the last review and eight cases were lost to follow up. Mean age was 66.7 (range 34 - 80) with 47.6% male. Mean follow-up days were 1109 (range 741 to 1591). 5 (2.2%) were revised for infection with 1 revised for pain. The 3-year survival rate was 97.6% and 99.6% for aseptic failure. AKS 46.2 (0 - 95) was preoperatively 88.3 (17 - 100) with 3 years P < 0.001. OKS 39.0 (22 - 53) was preoperatively 22.6 (12 - 53) with 3 years P < 0.001. 17 of the 219 who had x-rays (8%) had radiolucent zones on x-ray. Our results demonstrate a good early aseptic survivorship of the PFCSCC at three years of 99.6%, combined with a good functional and objective improvement in our patients in three years.
Cite this paper: A. Wood, L. McIlwain, C. Arthur, S. Aitken, A. Keenan, P. Walmsley and I. Brenkel, "PFC Sigma Cobalt-Chrome Total Knee Replacement: Early Outcomes Demonstrate No Significant Early Failures at the Three-Year Mark," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2014.41001.
References

[1]   No Authors, “National Joint Registry for England and Wales Summary to the 7th Annual Report,” 2009.

[2]   No Authors, “Johnson and Johnson. Company Literature and Marketing,” PFC Sigma Cobalt-Chrome, Leeds, 2010.

[3]   F. Hinrichs, M. Kuhl, U. Boundroit and P. Griss, “A Comparative Clinical Outcome Evaluation of Smooth (10 -13 Year Results) versus Rough Surface Finish (5 -8 Year Results) in an Otherwise Identically Designed Cemented Titanium Alloy Stem,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 123, No. 6, 2003, pp. 268-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0515-y

[4]   R. Y. Liow and D. W. Murray, “Which Primary Total Knee Replacement? A Review of Currently Available TKR in the United Kingdon,” Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 79, No. 5, 1997, pp. 335-340

[5]   J. N. Install, L. D. Dorr, R. D. Scott and W. N. Scott, “Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System,” Clinical Orthopaedics, Vol. 248, 1999, pp. 13-14.

[6]   P. Bennett, “A Comparison of Methods Used for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolic Disease among Orthopaedic Surgeons at Wolverhampton, United Kingdom and Auckland, New Zealand,” Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2009, pp. 81-88.

[7]   D. W. Murray, A. J. Carr and C. Bulstrode, “Survival Analysis of Joint Replacements,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 75B, No. 5, 1993, pp. 697-704.

[8]   R. D. Ferdinand and I. M. Pinder, “Survival Analysis of Joint Replacements,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (British), Vol. 79, No. 5, 1997, p. 878.

[9]   N. Hunter, R. A. E. Clayton and I. J. Brenkel, “Press Fit Condylar Sigma Total Knee Arthroplasty: 7 -9 Years Results,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2009, pp. 409-413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0446-6

[10]   R. A. E. Clayton, A. K. Amin, M. S. Gaston and I. J. Brenkel, “Five-Year Results of the Sigma Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2006, pp. 359-364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.06.003

[11]   C. A. Arthur, A. M. Wood, A. C. M. Keenan, R. A. E. Clayton and I. J. Brenkel, “Ten-Year Results of the Press Fit Condylar Sigma Total Knee Arthroplasty,” BJJ, Vol. 95, No. B2, 2013, pp. 1-4.

[12]   A. C. M. Keenan, A. M. Wood, C. A. Arthur, P. J. Jenkins, I. J. Brenkel and P. J. Walmsley, “Ten-Year Survival of Cemented Total Knee Replacements in Patients Aged Less than 55 Years,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (British), Vol. 94B, No. 7, 2012, pp. 928-931.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.27031

[13]   A. M. Wood, A. C. M. Keenan, C. H. C. Arthur, S. A. Aitken, P. J. Walmsley and I. J. Brenkel, “The Functional Outcome of Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: A 10-Year Matched Case Control Study,” OJO, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 128-132.

[14]   U. K. Munzinger, N. A. Maffiuletti, T. Guggi, M. Bizzini, S. Preiss and T. Drobny, “Five-Year Results of the Innex Total Knee Arthroplasty System,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 34, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1159-1165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0887-x

[15]   D. F. Dalury, R. A. Gonzales, M. J. Adams, T. A. Gruen and K. Trier, “Midterm Results with the PFC Sigma Total Knee Arthroplasty System,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2008, pp. 175-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.039

[16]   S. H. Zaki, I. Rafiq, A. Kapoor, R. Videsh, A. K. Gambhir and M. L. Porter, “Medium Term Results with the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Knee Proisthesis the Wrightington Experience,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol. 73, No. 1, 2007, pp. 55-59.

[17]   S. L. Whitehouse, A. W. Blom, A. H. Taylor, G. T. R. Pattison and G. C. Bannister, “The Oxford Knee Score; Problems and Pitfalls,” The Knee, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2005, pp. 287-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.005

[18]   D. L. Riddle, K. T. Lee and P. W. Stratford, “Use of SF-36 and SF-12 Health Status Measures: A Quantitative Comparison for Groups versus Individual Patients,” Medical Care, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2001, pp. 867-878.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200108000-00012

[19]   C. E. H. Scott, C. R. Howie, D. MacDonald and L. C. Biant, “Predicting Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Replacement,” Journal Bone and Joint Surgery (British), Vol. 92, No. B9, 2010, pp. 1253-1258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394

[20]   H. Bathis, L. Perlick, M. Tingart, C. Luring, D. Zurakowski and J. Grifka, “Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Surgery with the Conventional Technique,” Journal Bone and Joint Surgery (British), Vol. 86B, No. 5, 2004, pp. 682-687

[21]   M. J. Bankes, D. L. Back, S. R. Cannon and T. W. Briggs, “The Effect of Component Malalignment on the Clinical and Radiological Outcome of the Kinemax Total Knee Replacement,” Knee, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2003, pp. 55-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00050-9

[22]   A. Harvey, M. P. Manning, S. A. Sampath, R. Johnson and M. A. Elloy, “Alignment of Total Knee Arthroplasty: the Relationship to Radiolucency around the Tibial Component,” Medical Engineering & Physics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1995, pp. 182-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)95708-I

[23]   J. Mahaluxmivala, M. J. Bamkes, P. Nicolai, C. H. Aldam and P. W. Allen, “The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Component Position in 673 Press Fit Condylar Posterior Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasties,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 16, 2001, pp. 635-640.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.23569

 
 
Top