Applying Quantification of Qualitative Verbal Data to Asynchronous Written Discourse
Affiliation(s)
Department of English Education, Kongju National University, Kongju, South Korea. Department of Education, Kongju National University, Kongju, South Korea.
Department of English Education, Kongju National University, Kongju, South Korea. Department of Education, Kongju National University, Kongju, South Korea.
ABSTRACT
As more and more universities start to implement online components, the need to build online learning communities grows. An important and widely used type of online community is the internet forum. Internet forums operate asynchronously and each member can create threads and reply to others threads. Examination of each member’s writings can give valuable insight into the online community and the learning that is taking place within. This paper systematizes a method for researchers to investigate discussions on online forums. More specifically this paper lays out an 8-step process that a researcher may follow when investigating discussions on online forums.
As more and more universities start to implement online components, the need to build online learning communities grows. An important and widely used type of online community is the internet forum. Internet forums operate asynchronously and each member can create threads and reply to others threads. Examination of each member’s writings can give valuable insight into the online community and the learning that is taking place within. This paper systematizes a method for researchers to investigate discussions on online forums. More specifically this paper lays out an 8-step process that a researcher may follow when investigating discussions on online forums.
Cite this paper
Costley, J. & Han, S. (2013). Applying Quantification of Qualitative Verbal Data to Asynchronous Written Discourse. Creative Education, 4, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.412A1001.
Costley, J. & Han, S. (2013). Applying Quantification of Qualitative Verbal Data to Asynchronous Written Discourse. Creative Education, 4, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.412A1001.
References
[1] Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 [2] Creswell. J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications. [3] Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 6, 161-195. [4] Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self directed learning in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Adult Education Quarterly, 43, 136-148. [5] Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappleman, J. (2006). Revisting methodlogical issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and realiablity. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001 [6] Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. London: Sage Publications. [7] Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 484-495.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q [8] Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1996). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face to face and online supported group work.
http://umsl.edu/~wilmarthp/mrpc-web-resources/CA-analysis-method-to-measure-thinking-in-f2f.pdf [9] Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholas, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning in computer-mediated bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 243-265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003 [10] Salanda, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications. [11] Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Zhoa, J. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 95-104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320
[1] Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 [2] Creswell. J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications. [3] Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 6, 161-195. [4] Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self directed learning in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Adult Education Quarterly, 43, 136-148. [5] Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappleman, J. (2006). Revisting methodlogical issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and realiablity. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001 [6] Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. London: Sage Publications. [7] Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 484-495.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q [8] Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1996). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face to face and online supported group work.
http://umsl.edu/~wilmarthp/mrpc-web-resources/CA-analysis-method-to-measure-thinking-in-f2f.pdf [9] Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholas, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning in computer-mediated bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 243-265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003 [10] Salanda, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications. [11] Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Zhoa, J. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 95-104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320