American Academy of Pediatrics (2001). Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics, 107, 423-426.http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.2.423
 Ando, M., & Ueno, M. (2010). Analysis of the advantages of using tablet PC in e-learning. 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Nagaoka.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2010.42
 Animoca (2012). 50 Androids march to school for training day.http://www.animoca.com/en/2012/05/50-androids-march-to-school-for-training-day/
 Baker, R. D. (2010). Comparing the readability of text displays on paper, e-book readers, and small screen devices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Denton: University of North Texas.
 BBC News (2000). Gates wants laptop for every pupil. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/627182.stm
 Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers’ attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Studies, 4, 179206.
 Broos, A. (2005). Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8, 21-31.http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21
 Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & Colomina, R. (2010). Situated uses of ICT and mediation of joint activity in a primary education instructional sequence. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 517-540.
 Dror, I. E. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16, 215-223.http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/p&c.16.2.02dro
 Firth, N. (2012). Tablet PCs preserve indigenous knowledge. New Scientist Magazine, 2869. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428696.400-tablet-pcs-preserve-indigenous-knowledge.html
 Gasparini, A. A., & Culén, A. L. (2012). Tablet PCs–An assistive technology for students with reading difficulties? The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2012), Valencia. http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2012_2_20_20083
 Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
 Grace, K. E. (2011). Comparing the ipad to paper: Increasing reading comprehension in the digital age. M.D. Thesis, Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University.
 Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2006). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 583-599.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00640.x
 House, R. (2012). The inappropriateness of ICT in early childhood: Arguments from philosophy, pedagogy, and developmental research. In S. Suggate, & E. Reese (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Childhood Education and Development (pp. 105-120). London: Routledge
 Hui, A. N. N., & Lau, S. (2010). Formulation of policy and strategy in developing creativity education in four Asian Chinese societies: A policy analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 215-235.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x
 Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30, 390-408.http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640471211241663
 Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2011). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4, 5-22.
 Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of E-books. Displays, 30, 49-52.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002
 Lucas, B. (2001). Creative teaching, teaching creativity and creative learning. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 35-44). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
 Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of the influence of interactive CDROM story books and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 29, 263275.
 Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 329-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447310801920524
 Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., McPake, J., Stephen, C., & Adey, C. (2011). Parents, pre-schoolers and learning with technology at home: Some implications for policy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 361-371.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00432.x
 Ravichandran, P., & de Bravo, B. F. (2010). Young children and screen time (television, DVDs, computer). National Research Center for Women & Families. http://www.center4research.org/2010/05/young-children-and-screen-time-television-dvds-computer/
 Sheppard, D. (2011). Reading with iPads–The difference makes a difference. Education Today, 11, 12-15.
 Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students’ self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 202-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.010
 Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7322.214.171.124
 Stewart, S. (2012). Reading in a technological world: Comparing the iPad to print. M.S. Thesis, Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University.
 Vekiri, I. (2010). Boys’ and girls’ ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter? Computers & Education, 55, 16-23.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.013
 Vryzas, K., & Tsitouridou, M. (2002). Children and computers: Greek parents’ expectations. Educational Media International, 39, 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980210166053
 Wheeler, S. (2001). Information and communication technologies and the changing role of the teacher. Journal of Educational Media, 26, 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135816500120069292