OJOPM  Vol.4 No.1 , January 2014
Differentiation of the Aging Process of PEDOT:PSS Films under Inert Helium and Ambient Atmosphere for Two Different Rates of Thermal Treatment
Abstract: The conductivity difference Δσ between two similar PEDOT:PSS films, 120 nm thick, heated by 5 and 15 K/min from 80 to 440 K, the one under inert He and the other under ambient air gives an approximate measure of the influence of oxygen and moisture on the conductivity vs temperature T. The resulting curves Δσ = f(T) exhibit three different regions: at temperatures from 80 to 145 K for heating rate 5 K/min and from 80 to 200 K for 15 K/min, an intense degradation of the sample under ambient atmosphere was revealed by the abrupt increase of the difference of the conductivities between He and atmospheric air. At intermediate temperatures from 145 to 380 K for 5 K/min and 200 to 400 K for 15 K/min, the conductivity difference remains basically constant indicating a stabilization of the damage produced by oxygen and moisture. Finally, for temperatures higher than 380 to 400 K the degradation increases again. An explanation of this behavior is proposed based on the hydrophilic character of the PSS and the destructive role of oxygen at high temperatures. Moreover, the isotherms σ = σ(t), where t is the heating time, at 443 K, under inert He and under atmospheric air for one hour verify the significant role of oxygen and moisture on the electrical conductivity. Under He the conductivity increases monotonically with t, but under ambient air factors the conductivity competes with others decreasing it producing a maximum at about t = 10 min.
Cite this paper: Sakkopoulos, S. and Vitoratos, E. (2014) Differentiation of the Aging Process of PEDOT:PSS Films under Inert Helium and Ambient Atmosphere for Two Different Rates of Thermal Treatment. Open Journal of Organic Polymer Materials, 4, 1-5. doi: 10.4236/ojopm.2014.41001.

[1]   B. Friedel, P. E. Keivanidis, T. J. K. Brenner, A. Abrusci, C. R. McNeill, R. H. Friend and N. C. Greenham, “Ef- fects of Layer Thickness and Annealing of PEDOT:PSS Layers in Organic Photodetectors,” Macromolecules, Vol. 42, No. 17, 2009, pp. 6741-6747.

[2]   U. Lang, E. Müller, N. Naujoks and J. Dual, “Microscopical Investigations of PEDOT:PSS Thin Films,” Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 19, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1215-1220.

[3]   T. Stocker, A. Kohler and R. Moos, “Why Does the Electrical Conductivity in PEDOT:PSS Decrease with PSS Content? A Study Combining Thermoelectric Measurements with Impedance Spectroscopy,” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, Vol. 50, No. 14, 2012, pp. 976-983.

[4]   E. Vitoratos, S. Sakkopoulos, E. Dalas, N. Paliatsas, D. Karageorgopoulos, F. Petraki, S. Kennou and S. A. Choulis, “Thermal Degradation Mechanisms of PEDOT:PSS,” Organic Electronics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2009, pp. 61-66.

[5]   E. Vitoratos, S. Sakkopoulos. N. Paliatsas, K. Emmanouil and S. A. Choulis, “Conductivity Degradation Study of PEDOT:PSS Films under Heat Treatment in Helium and Atmospheric Air,” Open Journal of Organic Polymer Materials, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 7-11.

[6]   C. L. Chochos and S. A. Choulis, “How the Structural Deviations on the Backbone of Conjugated Polymers Influence their Optoelectronic Properties and Photovoltaic Performance,” Progress in Polymer Science, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1326-1414.

[7]   H. H. Wieder, “Laboratory Notes of Electrical and Galvanomagnetic Measurements,” Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979.

[8]   Y.-J. Lin, Y.-M. Chin, J.-C. Lin and Y.-C. Su, “Band Bending at the Conducting Polymer/Indium Tin Oxide Interfaces with and without Ultraviolet Treatment,” Applied Surface Science, Vol. 256, No. 21, 2010, pp. 6259-6261.

[9]   L. S. C. Pingree, B. A. MacLeod and D. S. Ginger, “The Changing Face of PEDOT:PSS Films: Substrate, Bias, and Processing Effects on Vertical Charge Transport,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol. 112, No. 21, 2008, pp. 7922-7927.

[10]   Z. Xiong and C. Liu, “Optimization of Inkjet Printed PEDOT:PSS Thin Films through Annealing Processes,” Organic Electronics, Vol. 13, No. 9, 2012, pp. 1532-1540.

[11]   I. Winter, C. Reese, J. Hormes, G. Heywang and F. Jonas, “The Thermal Ageing of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). An Investigation by X-Ray Absorption and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 194, No. 1, 1995, pp. 207-213.

[12]   A. Elschner, “The Spectral Sensitivity of PEDOT:PSS Films,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Vol. 95, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1333-1338.

[13]   K. Norman, M. V. Madsen, S. A. Gevorgyan and F. C. Krebs, “Degradation Patterns in Water and Oxygen of an Inverted Polymer Solar Cell,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 132, No. 47, 2010, pp. 16883-16892.

[14]   A. N. Papathanassiou, I. Sakellis, J. Grammatikakis, E. Vitoratos and S. Sakkopoulos, “Exploring Electrical Conductivity within Mesoscopic Phases of Semiconducting Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrene sulfonate) Films by Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy,” Ap- plied Physics Letters, Vol. 103, No. 12, 2013, pp. 123304- 1-5.

[15]   J. Huang, P. F. Miller, J. S. Wilson, A. J. de Mello, J. C. de Mello and D. D. C. Bradley, “Investigation of the Effects of Doping and Post-Deposition Treatments on the Conductivity, Morphology, and Work Function of Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxyphenethiophene)/Poly(styrene sulfonate) Films,” Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2005, pp. 290-296.