Mechanical CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) devices help performing correct chest compressions in the event of a cardiorespiratory arrest. These devices are comfortable and useful, they keep chest compression following the recommendations as they do not depend on interpersonal variability, they do not get tired, their use is simple and one of the rescuers is released from this task, thus facilitating the assistance. Besides, their use in transport conditions makes it safer. However, when coming to results, these mechanical CPR devices have not clearly demonstrated such an advantage, neither in the field of cardiac arrest, nor in organ preservation in the case of donors after cardiac death. In donors after cardiac death they are widely used by most of the emergency services involved, but a number of injuries produced in lungs during the early years of their use have made it controversial. In this paper we make a review of the road traveled by mechanical CPR devices and of the main articles which mark the way.
Cite this paper
Mateos Rodríguez, A. , Navalpotro Pascual, J. , Brunete Ingelmo, V. and Carmona Jiménez, F. (2013) Current situation of mechanical CPR devices in donors after cardiac death. Open Journal of Emergency Medicine
, 5-7. doi: 10.4236/ojem.2013.12002
 Nielsen, N., Sandhall, L., Schersten, F., Friberg, H. and Olsson, S.E. (2005) Successful resuscitation with mechanical CPR, therapeutic hypothermia and coronary intervention during manual CPR after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 65, 111-113.
 Casner, M., Anderson, D., et al. (2005) Preliminary report of the impact of a new CPR assist device on the rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital car- diac arrest. Pre-Hospital Emergency Medicine, 9, 61-67.
 Steen, S., Liao, Q., Pierre, L., Paskevicius, A. and Sjoberg, T. (2002) Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation, 55, 285-599.
 (2012) Consent document for asystole donors in Spain. Organización Nacional de Trasplantes.
 ESOT (2013) 6th International Conference Donors after Cardiac Death. European Society for Organ Transplantation, Paris.
 Smekal, D., Johansson, J., Huzevka, T. and Rubertsson, S. (2009) No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS? device—A pilot study. Resuscitation, 80, 1104-1107.