OJOG  Vol.3 No.10 , December 2013
Routine abortion training matters for obstetrics and gynecology residents
ABSTRACT


Background: We set out to compare resident perspective regarding self-rated ability to perform abortion procedures, abortion attitudes and satisfaction with training at programs with routine and optional abortion training. Methods: We distributed surveys and conducted 1-h focus groups for 62 residents at six New York City OB/GYN programs; three offer routine abortion training. We compared resident survey responses at programs with routine versus optional training regarding self-rated ability to perform abortion procedures, abortion attitudes and satisfaction with training. We reviewed focus group transcripts to understand differences related to satisfaction with abortion training. Results: Residents at routine programs reported higher proportions of self-rated ability to perform abortion procedures (all surveyed procedures p ≤ 0.05) and were more likely to fully participate in abortion services than residents at optional programs (42/45 vs. 12/17, p = 0.03). Residents at routine programs were more likely to be “very satisfied” with training (44/45 vs. 12/17, p < 0.001) based on three aspects of training: patient care management, self-rated ability to perform abortion procedures and rotation characteristics. Conclusion: Residents who received routine abortion training have higher rates of self-reported procedural competency and are more likely to be satisfied with training than residents who were offered optional training.



Cite this paper
Lim, S. , Westover, C. , Ratan, R. and Guiahi, M. (2013) Routine abortion training matters for obstetrics and gynecology residents. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 727-731. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.310134.
References
[1]   The Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Educational Objectives: Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ed., CREOG. 2009, New York: Professional Publishing Group, Ltd.

[2]   (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 424: Abortion access and training. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 113, 247-250.

[3]   Eastwood, K.L., Kacmar, J.E., Steinauer, J., Weitzen, S. and Boardman, L.A. (2006) Abortion training in United States obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 303-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000224705.79818.c9

[4]   Almeling, R., Tews, L.and Dudley, S. (2000) Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, 1998. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 268-271, 320. http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/2648194

[5]   ACGME (2011) Obstetrics/Gynecology Program Requirements. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/ Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRsources/220_OBGYN_Abortion_Training_Clarification.pdf

[6]   Ryan Program. (2011) The Kenneth J. Ryan Residency Training Program in Abortion and Family Planning. http://www.ryanprogram.org

[7]   Guiahi, M., Westover, C., Lim, S. and Westhoff, C.L. (2012) The New York City mayoral abortion training initiative at public hospitals. Contraception, 86, 577-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. contraception.2012.02.010

[8]   Jackson, C.B. and Foster, A.M. (2012) Ob/Gyn training in abortion care: Results from a national survey. Contraception, 86, 407-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.02.007

[9]   Shanahan, M.A., Metheny, W.P., Star, J. and Peipert, J.F. (1999) Induced abortion. Physician training and practice patterns. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 44 428-432.

[10]   Guiahi, M., Westover, C., Lim, S. and Westhoff, C.L. (2011) Enablers and barriers to abortion training in New York City. Contraception, 84, 308-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.027

[11]   Creswell, J.W., Fetters, M.D. and Ivankova, N.V. (2004) Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.104

[12]   Steinauer, J., Drey, E.A., Lewis, R., Landy, U. and Learman, L.A. (2005) Obstetrics and gynecology resident satisfaction with an integrated, comprehensive abortion rotation. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105, 1335-1340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000158859.35943.be

[13]   Steinauer, J.E., Landy, U., Jackson, R.A. and Darney, P.D. (2003) The effect of training on the provision of elective abortion: A survey of five residency programs. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 188, 1161-1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.309

[14]   Paul, M., Nobel, K., Goodman, S., Lossy, P., Moschella, J.E. and Hammer, H. (2007) Abortion training in three family medicine programs: Resident and patient outcomes. Family Medicine Journal, 39, 184-189.

[15]   MacIsaac, L. and Vickery, Z. (2012) Routine training is not enough: structured training in family planning and abortion improves residents’ competency scores and intentions to provide abortion after graduation more than ad hoc training. Contraception, 85, 294-298. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.contraception.2011.06.014

[16]   Steinauer, J., Landy, U., Fillipone, H., Laube, D., Darney, P.D. and Jackson, R.A. (2008) Predictors of abortion provision among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists: A national survey. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 198, 39 E1-E6.

[17]   Dalton, V.K., Harris, L.H., Bell, J.D., et al. (2011) Treatment of early pregnancy failure: Does induced abortion training affect later practices? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 204, E1-E6.

[18]   Mandel, L.S., Goff, B.A. and Lentz, G.M. (2005) Self-assessment of resident surgical skills: Is it feasible? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 193, 1817-1822.

 
 
Top