ENG  Vol.5 No.10 B , October 2013
Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Jaipur Foot and Polyurethane Foot

FEA is amongst best methods that help users to solve complex problems. There are fixed number of nodes in each ele-ment of the model that define the element boundaries to which boundary condition and loads can be applied. The geo-metry of the structure, the load applications, stress and displacement gradients can be approximated in a accurate man-ner, if the mesh is finer. The problem with the foot was unusual cracks in JP Foot and early breakage of PU Foot due to crack propagation[1]. To solve this problem we modelled the foot using SolidWorks and performed FEA Analysis for single leg below knee amputee patients. After analysis, it has been concluded that JP Foot as compared to PU Foot has more stress bearing capacity but has less displacement threshold due to its material properties[2]. This work will lead to optimization of both the feet thus enhancing the durability of foot.


Cite this paper: Sharma, P. , Sharma, S. , Vidhya, S. and Mathur, M. (2013) Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Jaipur Foot and Polyurethane Foot. Engineering, 5, 518-521. doi: 10.4236/eng.2013.510B106.

[1]   Bis Jaipur-Foot Final Report, BMVSS, Jaipur.

[2]   V. V. Karunakaran, “Quality Assurance and Optimization Studies of Light Weight PU Prosthetic Foot,” Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2006, pp. 63-69.

[3]   L. Zheng, et al., “3D Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress around Distally Osseointegrated Implant for Artificial Limb Attachment,” Key Engineering Material, Vol. 288-289, 2005, pp. 653-656.

[4]   D. A. Winter, “Kinematic and Kinetic Patterns in Human GAIT: VARIABILITY and Compensating Effects,” Human Movement Science, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 51-76.

[5]   M. M. Rodgers, “Dynamic Foot Biomechanic,” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 6, 1995, pp. 306-316.

[6]   W. C. C. Lee, M. Zhang, P. P. Y. Chan and D. A. Boone, “Gait Analysis of Low-Cost Flexible-Shank Transtibial Prostheses,” Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 370-377.

[7]   C. W. Chan and A. Rudins, “Foot Biomechanics during Walking and Running,” Mayo Clinic proceedings Mayo Clinic, Vol. 69, 1994, pp. 448-461.

[8]   M. Argin and G. G. Karady, “Characterization of Polyurethane Foam Dielectric Strength,” Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 14, 2008, pp. 350-356.