A total of twelve field trials (6 with kidney bean and 6 with white bean) were conducted over a three-year period (2010 to 2012) at various locations in Ontario to evaluate the tolerance of kidney and white bean to imazethapyr applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), and postemergence (POST) at 37.5, 75 and 150 g·ai·ha-1. Imazethapyr applied PPI or PRE in kidney or white bean caused 0%-1%, 0%-4%, and 0%-9% injury at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after application (WAA), respectively. However, the injury was transient and had no adverse effect on shoot dry weight, height, seed moisture content, and yield of kidney or white bean except for shoot dry weight which was reduced 32% with imazethapyr applied PPI compared to the weed free control in white bean. Imazethapyr applied POST in kidney or white bean caused as much as 17%, 18%, and 11% injury at 1, 2, and 4 WAA, respectively. There was no adverse effect on shoot dry weight, height, seed moisture content, and yield of kidney or white bean except for imazethapyr applied POST which increased seed moisture content 1.9% compared to the weed free control in white bean. Based on these results, there is an adequate margin of crop safety in dry bean to imazethapyr applied PPI or PRE at 37.5 or 75 g·ai·ha-1 in kidney and white beans. However, there is not an adequate margin of crop safety for imazethapyr applied POST at rates higher than 37.5 g·ai·ha-1 in kidney and white bean.
Cite this paper
Soltani, N. , Nurse, R. and Sikkema, P. (2013) Effect of imazethapyr application timing in kidney and white bean. Agricultural Sciences
, 678-682. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.412091
 Kulasekera, K. (2013) Estimated area, yield, production and farm value of specified field crops, Ontario, 2001-2012. Metric Units. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/estimate_metric.htm
 Arnold, N.R., Murray, W.M., Gregory, J.E. and Smeal, D. (1993) Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations. Weed Technology, 7, 361-364.
 Bauer, T.A., Renner, K.A., Penner, D. and Kelly J.D. (1995) Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to imazethapyr. Weed Science, 43, 417-424.
 Blackshaw, R.E. and Esau, R. (1991) Control of annual broadleaved weeds in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technology, 5, 532-538.
 Urwin, C.P., Wilson, R.G. and Mortensen, D.A. (1996) Responses of dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars to four herbicides. Weed Technology, 10, 512-518.
 Wilson, R.G. and Miller, S.D. (1991) Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) responses to imazethapyr. Weed Technology, 5, 22-26.
 Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (2012) Guide to weed control. Publication 75. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Toronto.
 Senseman, S.A. (2007) Herbicide handbook. 9th Edition, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, 458 pp.
 Renner, K.A. and Powell, G.E. (1992) Responses of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown in rotation to clomazone, imazethapyr, bentazon, and acifluorfen. Weed Science, 40, 127-133.
 Soltani, N., Nurse, R.E., Robinson, D.E. and Sikkema, P.H. (2008) Response of pinto and Small Red Mexican bean to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technology, 22, 195-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-091.1
 Soltani, N., Shropshire, C., Cowan, T. and Sikkema, P.H. (2003) Tolerance of cranberry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of S-metolachlor and imazethapyr. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83, 645-648.http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P03-006
 Blackshaw, R.E. and Saindon, G. (1996) Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) tolerance to imazethapyr. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 76, 915-919.http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps96-153
 Blackshaw, R.E., Molnar, L.J., Muendel, H.H., Saindon, G. and Li, X. (2000) Integration of cropping practices and herbicide improves weed management in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technology, 14, 327-336.http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0327:IOCPAH]2.0.CO;2