CUS  Vol.1 No.4 , December 2013
Urban Amenities and the Development of Creative Clusters: The Case of Brazil
Abstract: This paper describes the creative potential of Brazilian territories, including aspects pointed as cities’ comparative advantages in terms of creativity: cultural facilities, labor market and public expenditures in culture. The paper uses clustering analysis, applied to secondary data from the Brazilian Demographic Census (IBGE), Survey of Basic Municipal Information (MUNIC/IBGE) and municipal expenditures in culture from National Treasury (FINBRA). Among the six clusters which were created, three are well defined and the others are quite mixed. Cluster 1 includes the two largest and most developed cities in Brazil, S?o Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Cluster 2 is composed of capitals of important states in Brazil and cities where large universities are located. We named this cluster as creative university centers. Cluster 3 comprises 99 municipalities and can be named as centers of cultural and ecological tourism.
Cite this paper: Machado, A. , Simões, R. and Diniz, S. (2013) Urban Amenities and the Development of Creative Clusters: The Case of Brazil. Current Urban Studies, 1, 92-101. doi: 10.4236/cus.2013.14010.

[1]   Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). Determining heterogeneous behavior for theater attendance. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32, 127-151.

[2]   Ahlfeldt, G. M., & Maennig, W. (2010). Substitutability and Complementarity of Urban Amenities: External effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Economics, 38, 285-323.

[3]   Angel, D. (1989). The Labor market for Engineers in the U.S. SemiConductor Industry. Economic Geography, 65, 99-112.

[4]   Benhamou, F. (2007). A Economia da Cultura. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.

[5]   Bille, T., & Schulze, G. G. (2008). Culture in urban and regional development. In V. A. Ginsburgh, & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Oxford: North-Holland Elsevier.

[6]   Blomquist, G., Berger, M., & Hoehn, J. (1988). Nem estimates of quality of life in urban areas. American Economic Review, 78, 89-107.

[7]   Bonato, L., Gargliardi, F., & Gorelli, S. (1990). The demand for live performing arts in Italy. Journal of Cultural Economics, 14, 41-52.

[8]   Borgonovi, F. (2004). Performing arts attendance: An economic approach. Applied Economics, 36, 17.

[9]   Bourdieu, P., & Darbel, P. (1969). L’ amour de l’art. Lês musées d’ art européen et leur public. Paris: De Minuit.

[10]   Clark, T. N. (2004) The city as an entertainment machine. Research in Urban Policy, 9. London: Elsevier.

[11]   Clark, D. E., & Kahn, J. R. (1988). The social benefits of urban cultural amenities. Journal of Regional Science, 28, 363-377.

[12]   Cwi, D. (1980). Public support of the arts: Three arguments examined. Journal of Cultural Economics, 4, 39-62.

[13]   Diniz, S. C., & Machado, A. F. (2010). Analysis of the Consumption of Artistic-Cultural Goods and Services in Brazil. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34, 244-265.

[14]   Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

[15]   Glaeser, E., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27-50.

[16]   Golgher, A. (2008). As cidades e a classe criativa no Brasil: DiferenÇas espaciais na distribuiÇão de indivíduos qualificados nos municípios brasileiros. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de PopulaÇão, 25, 109-129.

[17]   Golgher, A. B. (2011). A distribuiÇão de indivíduos qualificados nas regiões metropolitanas brasileiras: A influência do entretenimento e da diversidade populacional. Nova Economia, 21, 109-134.

[18]   Gottlieb, P. (1994). Amenities as an Economic Development Tool: Is there enough evidence? Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 270-285.

[19]   Gottlieb, P. (1995). Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development. Urban Studies, 32, 1413-1436.

[20]   Granger, M., & Blomquist, G. (1999). Evaluating the influence of amenities on the location of manufacturing establishments in urban areas. Urban Studies, 36.

[21]   Hermann, B., & Haddad, E. (2003). Mercado Imobiliário e Amenidades Urbanas: A ViewThrough the Window. XXXI Encontro Nacional De Economia—Anpec. Anais. ANPEC, Porto Seguro.

[22]   Herzog, H., & Schlottmann, A. (1993). Valuing Amenities and Disamenities of Urban Scale: Can higger be better? Journal of Regional Science, 33, 145-165.

[23]   Knapp, T., & Graves, P. (1989). On the role of amenities in models of migration and regional development. Journal of Regional Science, 29, 71-87.

[24]   Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.

[25]   Lazzeretti, L. (2013). Cultural and creative industries. Creative Industries and Innovation in Europe Concepts, Measures and Comparative Case Studies. Routledge.

[26]   Mcgranahan, D., & Wojan, T. (2007). Recasting the creative class to examine growth processes in rural and urban counties. Regional Studies, 41, 1-20.

[27]   Macedo, P. B. R., & Simões, R. (1998). Amenidades Urbanas e CorrelaÇão Espacial: Uma análise intra-urbana para BH (MG). Revista Brasileira de Economia, 52, 525-542.

[28]   Malecki, E. (1984). High technologyand local economic development. Journal of American Planning Association, 50, 262-269.

[29]   Markusen, A. (2006) Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from the study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1921-1940.

[30]   Markusen, A., Hall, P., & Glasmeier, A. (1986). High Tech America: The what, how and why of sunrise industries. Boston: Allen and Irwin.

[31]   Mingoti, S. A. (2007). Análise de dados através de métodos de estatística multivariada. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.

[32]   Perloff, H. (1979) Using the arts to improve life in the city. Journal of Cultural Economics, 3, 1-21.

[33]   Ringstad, V., & LØyland, K. (2006) The demand for books estimated by means of consumer survey data. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30, 141-155.

[34]   Rocha, R., & Magalhães, A. (2011) Qualidade das amenidades urbanas: Uma estimaÇão da propensão marginal a pagar para as regiões metropolitanas do Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, 41.

[35]   Silveira Neto, R., & Azzoni, C. R. (2004). Disparidades regionais de renda no Brasil. In Encontro Regional De Economia—Anpec Nordeste. anais. Fortaleza: ANPEC/BNB.

[36]   Simões, R. F., Garcia, R. A., & Lima, A. C. (2012). Novas centralidades e interiorizaÇões na Amazônia: O modelo CENTRALINA. Belo Horizonte/Belém/São José dos Campos; PROJETO URBIS/ AMAZÔNIA—ITVS/INPE (mimeo).

[37]   Sivitanidou, R., & Sivitanides, P. (1995). The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 35, 391-415.

[38]   Smith, L., Rosen, K., & Fallis, G. (1988). Recent development in economic models of housing markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 29-64.

[39]   Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67, 76-90.

[40]   Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[41]   UNDP. (2008). The Creative Economy Report 2008.

[42]   Vandell, K. D., & Lane, J. S. (1989). The economics of architecture and urban design: Some preliminary findings. Real Estate Economics, 17, 235-260.