OJPed  Vol.3 No.4 , December 2013
Room for improvement: Patterns of referral misdiagnosis to a vascular anomalies center
Abstract: Objective: Vascular anomalies are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Errors in diagnosis lead to treatment delay, inappropriate interventions and prolonged suffering. The aim of this study was to analyze patterns of misdiagnosis among patients referred to a vascular anomalies center (VAC). This will better define the problem and may be used to refine and improve referral guidelines for patients with vascular anomalies. Patients and Methods: After IRB approval, we performed a single-center retrospective review of all patients referred to a vascular anomaly between January 1, 2008 and December 15, 2011. Evaluation of both referral and final diagnosis was made. Data regarding accuracy of diagnosis were determined and compared for both vascular tumors and malformations. Results: Mean age was 7.9 ± 7.7 (13 days - 66 years). 42% had a correct diagnosis at the time of referral. Vascular tumors were correctly diagnosed more often than vascular malformations (58% vs 38%). The most common misdiagnosis for infantile hemangioma (IH) was venous malformation (VM). The most common misdiagnosis for VM was IH. Nonspecific and historical terms such as “mass”, “lymphangioma”, and “cavernous hemangioma” frequently appear as the referral diagnosis. Conclusion: Referral misdiagnosis is common. IH and VM are frequently confused and if there is any uncertainty in the diagnosis, these patients should also be referred to a VAC, in addition to the more complicated anomalies. Outdated nomenclature remains prevalent and continued efforts should be made to adhere to International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification. Improvements in diagnostic accuracy are likely to greatly improve patients’ care.
Cite this paper: Levin, D. , Speer, A. , Pierce, J. , Nowicki, D. , Arkader, A. , Stanley, P. , Panossian, A. and Anselmo, D. (2013) Room for improvement: Patterns of referral misdiagnosis to a vascular anomalies center. Open Journal of Pediatrics, 3, 331-336. doi: 10.4236/ojped.2013.34059.

[1]   Enjolras, O., Wassef, M. and Chapot, R. (2007) Color atlas of vascular tumors and vascular malformations. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[2]   Mulliken, J.B. and Glowacki, J. (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: A classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 69, 412-422.

[3]   Enjolras, O. and Mulliken, J.B. (1997) Vascular tumors and vascular malformations (new issues). Advanced Dermatology, 13, 375-423.

[4]   Hassanein, A.H., Mulliken, J.B., Fishman, S.J. and Greene, A.K. (2011) Evaluation of terminology for vascular anomalies in current literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 127, 347-351.

[5]   Marler, J.J. and Mulliken, J.B. (2005) Current management of hemangiomas and vascular malformations. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 32, 99-116, ix.

[6]   Greene, A.K., Liu, A.S., Mulliken, J.B., Chalache, K. and Fishman, S.J. (2011) Vascular anomalies in 5621 patients: Guidelines for referral. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 46, 1784-1789.

[7]   Aboutalebi, A., Jessup, C.J., North, P.E. and Mihm, M.C. (2012) Histopathology of vascular anomalies. Facial Plastic Surgery, 28, 545-553.