TI  Vol.2 No.1 , February 2011
Evaluation on Information Technology Service Management Process with AHP
Abstract: Though analyzing the IT service management framework and associated processes of KM company, this paper determines various indicators of IT service management process. The weights of each indicator are calculated with analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and the evaluation was executed in KM company. And the suggestions are proposed with consideration of both the evaluation results and the real situation of KM company’s IT service management. The case is deeply considered in the views of IT service management objectives and misunderstandings, customer satisfaction model of IT service management, knowledge supporting structure of IT service management. It is concluded that if the organization wishes to successfully implement IT service management’s customer satisfaction model, it should eliminate the misunderstandings of IT service objectives first, while the adoption of knowledge supporting structure of IT service management can play a multiplier effect.
Cite this paper: nullJ. Wan, H. Zhang and D. Wan, "Evaluation on Information Technology Service Management Process with AHP," Technology and Investment, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011, pp. 38-46. doi: 10.4236/ti.2011.21005.

[1]   Zaltbommel, “Foundations of IT Service Management based on ITIL,” Van Haren Publishing, 2005.

[2]   T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” New York: McGraw-Hill International, 1980.

[3]   Dean Lane, “CIO Wisdom: Best Practices from Silicon Valley’s Leading IT Experts,” Prentice-Hall, Inc, 2004.

[4]   C. C. Chen, C. Law and S. C. Yang, “Managing ERP Implementation Failure: A Project Management Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 56, No. 1, January, 2009, pp.157-170. doi:10.1109/TEM.2008.2009802

[5]   D. Severance and J. Passino, “Make It Work,” John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

[6]   Brooks and P. Frederick, “No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 20, No. 4, April, 1987, pp.10-19.

[7]   J. P. Wan, “Research on Software Product Support Structure,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, October, 2009, pp.174-194. doi:10.4236/jsea.2009.23025

[8]   J. P. Wan, Y. F. Wang and C. W. Zheng, “Research on Knowledge Support Structure of IT Service Management,” IEEE WiCom 2007, Shanghai, China, September, 2007, pp. 6729-6733.

[9]   P. Weill, “IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results,” Harvard Business School Press, 2004.

[10]   Son Pham, “Pulling it All Together: How to Implement ITSM,” ITSM.ppt, 2007.

[11]   C. Kelbrick, “ITSM Road Map, services/downloads/hp_itsm_work-shop.pdf,” 2007.

[12]   G. X. Zhao, “ITSM Improvement and Promotion, http: //,” 2009.

[13]   D. Lane, “CIO Wisdom: Best Practices from Silicon Valley’s Leading IT Experts,” Prentice-Hall, Inc, 2004.

[14]   M. Y. Zuo, “The Guidelines of CIO Knowledge Body,” Beijing Chian, Publishing House of Electronics, 2004, pp.301-425.

[15]   P. Bourque, R. Dupuis, A. Abran, James W. Moore and L. Tripp, “The guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge,” IEEE Software, Vol. 16, No. 6, November/December,1999, pp.35-44

[16]   J. Azar, R. K. Smith and D. Cordes, “Value-Oriented Requirements Prioritization in a Small Development Organization,” IEEE Software, Vol.24, No.1, January/February, 2007, pp. 32-37. doi:10.1109/MS.2007.30