This multicenter clinical study was to assess the clinical usability of an oral
moisture-checking device in detecting the dry mouth patients and evaluating the
optimal measurement site. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised 250 patients
with dry mouth and 241 healthy volunteer subjects at 13 medical centers. This device
was used to measure the moisture degrees of the lingual mucosa and the buccal mucosa.
Subjective oral dryness, objective oral dryness, and saliva flow rates were also
compared between the two groups. For statistical analysis, receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The moisture degree of
the lingual mucosa was significantly lower in the dry mouth group (27.2 ± 4.9) than
that in the healthy group (29.5 ± 3.1, AUC = 0.653). When a lingual mucosa moisture
degree of 31.0 or higher was defined as normal, less than 27.0 as dry mouth, and
27.0 to less than 31.0 as borderline zone of dry mouth, both the sensitivity and
the specificity for the diagnosis of dry mouth were close to 80%. Conclusion: These
results suggest that the oral moisture-checking device is a usable screening device
for dry mouth.
Cite this paper
Fukushima, Y. , Yoda, T. , Kokabu, S. , Araki, R. , Murata, T. , Kitagawa, Y. , Omura, K. , Toya, S. , Ito, K. , Funayama, S. , Iwabuchi, H. , Asano, K. , Imai, Y. , Negishi, A. , Yokoo, S. , Matsumoto, G. , Kubota, E. , Watanabe, H. , Kusama, M. , Onizawa, K. , Goto, T. , Nakamura, S. , Nakazawa, R. , Harada, K. and Fujibayashi, T. (2013) Evaluation of an oral moisture-checking device for screening dry mouth. Open Journal of Stomatology
, 440-446. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2013.38073
 Yamada, H., Nakagawa, Y., Nomura, Y., Yamamoto, K., Suzuki, M., Watanabe, N.Y., Saito, I. and Seto, K. (2005) Preliminary results of moisture checker for mucus in diagnosing dry mouth. Oral Diseases, 11, 405-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01136.x
 Takahashi, F., Koji, T. and Morita, O. (2006) Oral dryness examination: Use of an oral moisture checking device and modified cotton method. Prosthodontic Reserch and Practice, 5, 26-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2186/prp.5.26
 Murakami, M., Nishi, Y., Kamashita, Y. and Nagaoka, E. (2009) Relationship between medical treatment and oral dryness diagnosed by oral moisture-checking device in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 53, 67-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2008.08.010
 Fukushima, Y., Kokabu, S., Kanaya, A., Hori, N., Tateyama, T., Sato, T., Sakata, Y., Kobayashi, A., Araki, R., Yanagisawa, H. and Yoda, T. (2007) Experimental examination of appropriate measurement method of oral moisture checking device. Japanese Society for Oral Mucous Membrane, 13, 16-25.
 Fukushima, Y., Yoda, T., Araki, R., Hori, N., Kokabu, S., Yakata, Y. and Kobayashi, A. (2009) Experimental examination of temporal variations of the moisture degree of the oral mucosa in ordinary persons. Japanese Society for Oral Mucous Membrane, 15, 15-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.6014/jjomm.15.15
 Committee for the Classification on Terminology of Japanese Society for Oral Mucous Membrane (2008) Classification of xerostomia (dry mouth). Japanese Society for Oral Mucous Membrane, 14, 86-88.
 Disabato-Mordarski, T. and Kleinberg, I. (1996) Measurement and comparison of the residual saliva on various oral mucosal and dentition surfaces in humans. Archives of Oral Biology, 41, 655-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(96)00055-6
 Peirce, J.C. and Cornell, R.G. (1993) Integrating stratumspecific likelihood ratios with the analysis of ROC curves. Medical Decision Making, 13, 141-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9301300208
 Osailan, S., Pramanik, R., Shirodaria, S., Challacombe, S.J. andProctor, G.B. (2011) Investigating the relationship between hyposalivation and mucosal wetness. Oral Diseases, 17, 109-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01715.x
 Won, S., Kho, H., Kim, Y., Chung, S. and Lee, S. (2001) Analysis of residual saliva and minor salivary gland secretions. Archives of Oral Biology, 46, 619-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(01)00018-8