ChnStd  Vol.2 No.4 , November 2013
Fertility Preferences of the Post-1980s Generation in Urban China
Author(s) Lei Xu
ABSTRACT
Born under the one-child policy and growing up in an environment of tremendous socioeconomic change, the post-1980s generation of China tends to have interesting fertility preferences. This study explores the fertility desire, gender preference, and potential utilization of fetal ultrasound among the post-1980s individuals in urban China, based on a survey conducted in Beijing and Puyang, China. The ideal number of children among the post-1980s was substantially lower than the replacement level. 26% of the respondents considered China’s family planning policies as the most important determinant of their fertility desire, whereas 57% of the respondents indicated economic factors as the major determinant. With respect to gender preference, nearly half of the respondents who desired one child indicated no preference, and 79% of those who desired two children preferred 1 boy and 1 girl. In terms of potential utilization of ultrasound, the large majority of the respondents indicated an intention to use ultrasound to check the wellness of the fetus. Nearly half of them wanted to know the gender of the fetus via ultrasound examination, which is illegal in China. The findings imply that urban China has been experiencing a transition from a top-down governmental promoted fertility decline to a bottom-up individual voluntary choice of low fertility. In the context of below replacement fertility and population ageing, step-by-step relaxations of the family planning policies may lead to a small, gradual, and beneficial fertility increase.

Cite this paper
Xu, L. (2013). Fertility Preferences of the Post-1980s Generation in Urban China. Chinese Studies, 2, 152-155. doi: 10.4236/chnstd.2013.24025.
References
[1]   Arnold, F., & Liu, Z. (1986). Sex preference, fertility, and family planning in China. Population and Development Review, 12, 221-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1973109

[2]   Chu, J. H. (2001). Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China. Population and Development Review, 27, 259-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00259.x

[3]   Gu, B., Wang, F., Guo, Z., & Zhang, E. (2007). China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 33, 129-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00161.x

[4]   Liang, Q., & Lee, C. F. (2006). Fertility and population policy: An overview. In D. L. Poston Jr., et al. (Eds.), Fertility, family planning, and population policy in China (pp. 8-19). New York: Routledge.

[5]   Veeck, G., Pannell, C. W., Smith, C. J., & Huang, Y. (2011). China’s geography: Globalization and the dynamics of political, economic, and social change (2nd ed.). Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

[6]   Wang, W. (2005). Son preference and educational opportunities of children in China—“I wish you were a boy!” Gender Issues, 22, 3-30.

[7]   Whyte, M. K., & Gu, S. (1987). Popular response to China’s fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 13, 471-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1973135

[8]   Yan, Y. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy and family change in a Chinese village, 1949-1999. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

[9]   Zeng, Y. (2007). Options of fertility policy transition in China. Population and Development Review, 33, 215-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00168.x

[10]   Zeng, Y., Ping, T., Gu, B., Yi, X., Li, B., & Li, Y. (1993). Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Population and Development Review, 19, 283-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2938438

[11]   Zhang, L., Feng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2006). Changing patterns of desired fertility. In D. L. Poston Jr., et al. (Eds.), Fertility, family planning, and population policy in China (pp. 89-109). New York: Routledge.

[12]   Zhu, W. X., Lu, L., & Hesketh, T. (2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy. British Medical Journal, 338, b1211. http://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b1211

 
 
Top