Back
 EPE  Vol.5 No.4 B , July 2013
Preliminary Analysis of Smart Grid Risk Index System and Evaluation Methods
Abstract: Combined the purpose and requirements of security and stability economic operations of the smart grid, a more comprehensive, risk indicator system of smart grid is established from five aspects of the smart grid strategic risk, external risk, financial risk, compliance risk, operational risks. On this basis, it is conducted smart grid risk assessments by integrated of the use of Borda sequence value method of the original risk matrix and AHP (hierarchical analysis method), in order to assess risk facing the smart grid and enterprise development more comprehensively, objectively and systematically and conveniently, and prompt companies continue to reduce risk, improve economic efficiency, continuously improve the targeted improvement measures and continue to improve the level of grid development.
Cite this paper: R. Liu, "Preliminary Analysis of Smart Grid Risk Index System and Evaluation Methods," Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2013, pp. 807-810. doi: 10.4236/epe.2013.54B155.
References

[1]   A. Ipakchi and F. Grid, “Albuyeh of the Future,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2009. doi:10.1109/MPE.2008.931384

[2]   J. M. Wang and T. Shi, “Construction of Evaluation Index System for Smart Grid,” East China Electric Power, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2012, pp. 0194-0196.

[3]   Z. D. Wang, Y. Huang, ect., “Study on Evaluation Indexes of Power Grid Development,” Journal of Northeast Dianli University Natural Science Edition, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2009, p. 84.

[4]   “Research Focuses and Advance Technologies of Smart Grid in Recent Years,” Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, Vol. 5722, pp. 2879-2886.

[5]   J. Gao and J. K. Wang, “Research on Communication Network Architecture of Smart Grid,” Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Future Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Hong Kong Education Society, Hong Kong:, 2012, 6.

[6]   Z. S. Hua, B. G. Gong and X. Y. Xu, “A DS- AHP Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Making Problem with in Complete Inform Ation,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 3. 2008.

[7]   X. M. Niu, “Comparison of Several Regular Comprehensive Evaluation Method,” Statistics and Decision.

[8]   C. Zhang, H. Z. Cheng, X. Xi, etc. “A Study of Distribution Network Feeding Modes Selection Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation,” Power System Technology, Vol. 30, No. 22, 2006, pp. 67-70.

[9]   X. R. Chang, J. F. Xing and J. Zhang, “Dispatcher Training Evaluation Based On Multi-grade Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method,” Power System Technology, Vol. 29, No. 17, 2005, pp. 31-33.

 
 
Top