IB  Vol.5 No.3 B , September 2013
Government R & D Subsidies, Political Relations and Technological SMEs Innovation Transformation
Author(s) Feifei Yu*
ABSTRACT

This paper studies the effect of government research and development (R&D) subsidies and political relations on the innovative activities of technological small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Moreover, the technology innovation path of SMEs is an important issue related to government R&D subsidies. This paper explores these effects using multiple case studies. Through case analyses of four biological pharmaceutical enterprises, we found that first, technological SMEs that receive a significant amount of government R&D subsidies will transform from exploitative innovation to explorative innovation in a short amount of time, whereas technological SMEs that receive less government R&D subsidies will perform less innovative activities over a long time. Second, technological SMEs with strong political relations tend to do more explorative innovation, whereas technological SMEs with weak political relations tend to do more exploitative innovation. Third, technological SMEs with strong political relations will promote the positive effect of government R&D subsidies on their innovation performance.


Cite this paper
F. Yu, "Government R & D Subsidies, Political Relations and Technological SMEs Innovation Transformation," iBusiness, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2013, pp. 104-109. doi: 10.4236/ib.2013.53B022.
References
[1]   Lach and Saul, “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2002, pp. 369-90.

[2]   M. P. Feldman and M. R. Kelley, “The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers: Government R&D; Policy, Economic Incentives and Private Firm Behavior,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1509-1521. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019

[3]   T. Koga, “R&D Subsidy and Self-Financed R&D: The Case of Japanese High-Technology Start-Ups. Small Business Economics,” Vol. 24, No. 1, 2005, pp. 53-62. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-3096-z

[4]   A. Goolsbee, “Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?” American Economic Review, 1998, Vol. 88, pp. 298-302.

[5]   T. J. Kelette,J. Moen and Z.Griliches, “Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies,” Research Policy, Vol. 29, 2000, pp. 471-495. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4

[6]   S. J. Wallsten, “The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2000, pp. 82-100. doi:10.2307/2601030

[7]   T. J. Buisseret, H. M. Cameron, et al. “What Difference Does It Make Additionality in the Public Support of RD in Large Firms,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 4-5, 1995, pp. 587-600.

[8]   S. Davenport, C. Grimes, et al., “Research Collaboration and Behavioral Additionality: A New Zealand Case study,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, pp. 55-68.

[9]   F.-M. Hsu, D.-J. Horng, et al., “The Effect of Government-sponsored R&D Programmes on Additionality in Recipient Firms in Taiwan,” Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 204-217. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001

 
 
Top