OJML  Vol.3 No.4 , December 2013
A Comparative Study of “as” and “Which” in Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses
Abstract: Both “as” and “which” can introduce a non-restrictive relative clause. But each of them has its own particular function in meaning, part of speech and sentence structure. Therefore sometimes they can have similar usage in a certain situation, while most often they are quite different and can not be used alternatively.
Cite this paper: Wang, J. & Tang, J. (2013). A Comparative Study of “as” and “Which” in Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 356-359. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.34046.

[1]   Bo, B. (2004). An advanced English grammar. Beijing: World Knowledge Press.

[2]   Du, Y. (2002). A new complete analysis on English grammar. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

[3]   Longman dictionary of contemporary English (4th ed., 2004). Beijing: Foreign Language and Research Press.

[4]   Oxford advanced learner’s English and Chinese dictionary (4th ed., 1997). Beijing: Commercial Press.

[5]   Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (6th ed., 2004). Beijing: Commercial Press.

[6]   Procter, P. (1978). Longman dictionary of contemporary English. London: Longman Group Limited.

[7]   Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman Inc.

[8]   Wang, G. D. (2005). Advanced college English grammar. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

[9]   Zhang, D., & Wen, Z. (1998). A Comprehensive English Grammar. Vol. 1. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

[10]   Zhang, K. (2005). A new English grammar (2nd ed.). Beijing: Higher Education Press.

[11]   Zhang, Z., & Sun, J. (2006). Modern English grammar in use. Beijing: Peking University Press.

[12]   Zhang, Z. (1997) A new English grammar (3rd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.