Back
 JSEA  Vol.6 No.11 , November 2013
Towards Developing Successful E-Government Websites
Abstract: Quality is a key factor to ensuring success of e-government websites. Therefore, a definition for high-quality e-government website is required, as well as, an e-government system’s quality evaluation methodology. This paper identifies quality attributes that are required to assess the quality of an e-government website, which should be considered by developers during the development of e-government applications. The primary goals are identifying, qualifying, categorizing, and ranking these factors, and then defining the interrelations among these quality factors.
Cite this paper: O. Rababah, T. Hamtini, O. Harfoushi, B. Al-Shboul, R. Obiedat and S. Nawafleh, "Towards Developing Successful E-Government Websites," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 6 No. 11, 2013, pp. 559-563. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2013.611067.
References

[1]   Y. Rogers, H. Sharp and J. Preece, “Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction,” 2nd Edition, Wily, New Jersey, 2007.

[2]   H. Jati and D. Dominic, “Quality Evaluation of e-Government Website Using Web Diagnostic Tools: Asian Case,” International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME), Kuala Lumpur, 3-5 April 2009, pp. 85-89.

[3]   D. T. Green and J. M. Pearson, “Integrating Website Usability with the Electronic Commerce Acceptance Model,” Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2011, pp. 181-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449291003793785

[4]   Georgia Tech Research Institute, “Overview of State Accessibility Laws, Policies, Standards and Other Resources,” 2012. http://accessibility.gtri.gatech.edu/sitid/stateLawAtGlance.php

[5]   A. Olalere and J. Lazar, “Accessibility of US Federal Government Home Pages: Section 508 Compliance and Site Accessibility Statements,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2011, pp. 303-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002

[6]   ISO, “ISO/IEC IS 9126: Software Product Evaluation-Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use,” International Organizational for Standardization, Geneva, 1991.

[7]   D. L. Baker, “Advancing E-Government Performance in the United States through Enhanced Usability Benchmarks,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009, pp. 82-88. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.004

[8]   L. Hasan and E. Abuelrub, “Assessing the Quality of Websites,” Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2009.03.001

[9]   O. Rababah, “Quality Assessment of E-Commerce Websites Using Bayesian Belief Network,” Loughborough University, Leicestershire, 2007.

[10]   T. L. Eleanor, “A Measure of Web Site Quality,” Management Department, Washburn Hall-WebQual?, 1999.

[11]   StatSoft, “Basic Statistics Introduction,” 2012. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stbasic.htm

[12]   M. Martin, “It’s Like...You Know: The Use of Analogies and Heuristics in Teaching Introductory Statistical Methods,” Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2003.

[13]   M. J. Kargar, A. R. Ramli, H. Ibrahim and S. B. Noor, “Towards a Practical and Valid Model for Assessing Quality of Information on the Web,” International Review on Computers and Software, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2007, pp. 80-88.

[14]   T. Hamtini and O. Rababa, “A Graphical Model for Assessing the Quality of E-Commerce Systems,” International Review on Computers and Software, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 9-17.

 
 
Top