JSEA  Vol.6 No.11 , November 2013
Towards Developing Successful E-Government Websites
ABSTRACT

Quality is a key factor to ensuring success of e-government websites. Therefore, a definition for high-quality e-government website is required, as well as, an e-government systems quality evaluation methodology. This paper identifies quality attributes that are required to assess the quality of an e-government website, which should be considered by developers during the development of e-government applications. The primary goals are identifying, qualifying, categorizing, and ranking these factors, and then defining the interrelations among these quality factors.


Cite this paper
O. Rababah, T. Hamtini, O. Harfoushi, B. Al-Shboul, R. Obiedat and S. Nawafleh, "Towards Developing Successful E-Government Websites," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 6 No. 11, 2013, pp. 559-563. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2013.611067.
References
[1]   Y. Rogers, H. Sharp and J. Preece, “Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction,” 2nd Edition, Wily, New Jersey, 2007.

[2]   H. Jati and D. Dominic, “Quality Evaluation of e-Government Website Using Web Diagnostic Tools: Asian Case,” International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME), Kuala Lumpur, 3-5 April 2009, pp. 85-89.

[3]   D. T. Green and J. M. Pearson, “Integrating Website Usability with the Electronic Commerce Acceptance Model,” Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2011, pp. 181-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449291003793785

[4]   Georgia Tech Research Institute, “Overview of State Accessibility Laws, Policies, Standards and Other Resources,” 2012. http://accessibility.gtri.gatech.edu/sitid/stateLawAtGlance.php

[5]   A. Olalere and J. Lazar, “Accessibility of US Federal Government Home Pages: Section 508 Compliance and Site Accessibility Statements,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2011, pp. 303-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002

[6]   ISO, “ISO/IEC IS 9126: Software Product Evaluation-Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use,” International Organizational for Standardization, Geneva, 1991.

[7]   D. L. Baker, “Advancing E-Government Performance in the United States through Enhanced Usability Benchmarks,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009, pp. 82-88. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.004

[8]   L. Hasan and E. Abuelrub, “Assessing the Quality of Websites,” Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2009.03.001

[9]   O. Rababah, “Quality Assessment of E-Commerce Websites Using Bayesian Belief Network,” Loughborough University, Leicestershire, 2007.

[10]   T. L. Eleanor, “A Measure of Web Site Quality,” Management Department, Washburn Hall-WebQual?, 1999.

[11]   StatSoft, “Basic Statistics Introduction,” 2012. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stbasic.htm

[12]   M. Martin, “It’s Like...You Know: The Use of Analogies and Heuristics in Teaching Introductory Statistical Methods,” Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2003.

[13]   M. J. Kargar, A. R. Ramli, H. Ibrahim and S. B. Noor, “Towards a Practical and Valid Model for Assessing Quality of Information on the Web,” International Review on Computers and Software, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2007, pp. 80-88.

[14]   T. Hamtini and O. Rababa, “A Graphical Model for Assessing the Quality of E-Commerce Systems,” International Review on Computers and Software, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 9-17.

 
 
Top