OJPP  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2013
Checkerboard Grid: Go and Chinese Chess—Urban Planning and Political Ideologies in American Westward Movement and Ancient China
Abstract: Among all forms of city planning, the grid plan appears, historically, to be the most measurable and recognizable system of civic geography. This paper will explore how and why different social groups have been able to define the symbolism of the grid to suit their own political purposes and how governments and patrons have utilized the grid as the spatial manifestation for their political ideologies. This paper will be based on case studies of cities operating under very dissimilar political systems, i.e., the cities of ancient China and the city of Chicago in the Unites States. I argue that the American grid plan focuses on its peripheries, and that the expansive instinct of the American grid was effective in building a coherent American nation, transcending regional and class divisions. By contrast, the Chinese grid plan emphasizes the center, and the practices of urban planning in ancient China symbolized the evaluative tactics of the elite.
Cite this paper: Zhang, S. (2013). Checkerboard Grid: Go and Chinese Chess—Urban Planning and Political Ideologies in American Westward Movement and Ancient China. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 502-506. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34072.

[1]   Ames, R. T. (1994). The art of rulership: A study of ancient Chinese political thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.

[2]   Bernard, M. B. (1977). Architectural practice in America, 1865-1965— Ideal and Reality. In: Kostof, S. (Ed.), The architect: Chapters in the history of the profession. New York: Oxford University Press.

[3]   Burnham, D. H., & Bennett, E. H. (1993) Plan of Chicago. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

[4]   Corboz, A. (2001). Die kulturellen grundlagen des territorialen rasters in den USA. In Die kunst, stadt und land zum sprechen zu bringen (pp. 186-200). Basel: Birkhauser.

[5]   Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[6]   Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline & punish, the birth of prison. New York: Random House.

[7]   Hildegard, B. J. (1976). Order upon land: The U.S. rectangular land survey and the Upper Mississippi Country. London: Oxford University Press.

[8]   Kostof, S. (1987). America by design. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9]   Linklater, A. (2002). Measuring America: How an untamed wilderness shaped the United States and fulfilled the promise of democracy. New York: Walker & Company.

[10]   MacDougall, E. B. (1990). The architectural historian in America: Studies in the history of art. Washington DC: National Gallery Art.

[11]   Mayer, H. M., & Wade, R. C. (1969). Chicago: Growth of a metropolis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

[12]   Reps, J. W. (1965). Making American landscape. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[13]   Reps, J. W. (1970). The forgotten frontier: Urban planning in the American west before 1890. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[14]   Reps, J. W. (1970). Town planning in frontier America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[15]   Steinhardt, N. S. (1990). Chinese imperial city planning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

[16]   Stilgoe, J. R. (2004). National design: Mercantile cities and the grid. In: Eggener, K. L. (Ed.), American architectural history: A contemporary reader. London and New York: Routledge.

[17]   Wright, A. F. (1997). The cosmology of the Chinese City. In: W. G. Skinner (Ed.), The City in Late Imperial China, Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

[18]   Wu, H. (1991). Tiananmen square: A political history of monuments. Representations, 35, 84-117.

[19]   Zhao, S. S. (2004). A nation-state by construction: Dynamics of modern Chinese nationalism. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

[20]   Zhu, J. F. (2004). Chinese spatial strategies: Imperial Beijing 14201911. London and New York: Routledge Curzon.