Critical approximations carried out from the global south entail spatial and epistemological challenges to the hegemony of western modernity. This article argues that José María Arguedas’ The Fox from Up Above and the Fox from Down Below(1971) produces a language that embodies and transforms an Aris-totelian conception of speech. Written in an avant-garde vernacular, the novelcongeals a multiplicity of worldviews, utopias, and mercantile discourses that converge in Chimbote-Peru. Guided by Jacques Ran-ciere’s Disagreement(1998) and Dissensus(2010), the analysis is divided in two stages. The first stage examines the notion of speech and a constitutive wrong that establishes a community. The second stage addresses the symbiotic relationship of speech, its place of enunciation, and the conception of an alternate social order. The analysis places Arguedas incritical dialogue with Aristotelian speech, Ranciere’s notion of wrong, and the emergence or failure of claiming speech in canonical history.
Izquierdo, L. (2013) Placing Place: Speech in José María Arguedas’ The Foxes. Advances in Literary Study, 1, 43-49. doi: 10.4236/als.2013.14011.
[1] Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford California: Stanford University Press. [2] Arguedas, J. M. (1992). El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo. México: Consejo Nacional Para La Cultura y Las Artes. [3] Arguedas, J. M. (2000). The fox from up above and the fox from down below. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. [4] Arguedas, J. M. (1974). El sue?o del pongo. In Agua y otros cuentos (pp. 161-168). Lima: Ed. Milla Batres. [5] Badiou, A. (2000). Theory of the subject. London, New York: Continuum. [6] Casey, E. (1998). The fate of place. Berkeley, London: University of California Press. [7] Castro-Klaren, S. (2011). The narrow pass of our nerves: Writing, coloniality and postcolonial theory. Madrid, Frankfurt: Iberoamericana- Vervuet. [8] Castro-Klaren, S. (2000). Like a pig, when he’s thinkin. In J. Ortega (Ed.), The fox from up above and the fox from down below (pp. 307-323). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. [9] Cornejo Polar, A. (1992). Un ensayo sobre “Los Zorros” de Arguedas. In E.-M. Fell (Ed.), El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo (pp. 297- 306). México: Consejo Nacional Para La Cultura y Las Artes. [10] Esposito, R. (2012). Living thought: The origins and actuality of Italian philosophy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. [11] Gómez Mango, E. (1992). Todas las lenguas. In E.-M. Fell (Ed.), El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo (pp. 360-370). México: Consejo Nacional Para La Cultura y Las Artes. [12] Gutiérrez, G. (2003). Entre las calandrias. Lima: CEP. [13] Gutiérrez, G. (1988). A theology of liberation. New York: Orbis Books. [14] Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. [15] Laclau, E. (2007). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Verso. [16] Lienhard, M. (1992). La “andinización” del vanguardismo urbano. In E.-M. Fell (Ed.), El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo (pp. 321-332). México: Consejo Nacional Para La Cultura y Las Artes. [17] Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [18] Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of modernity: Global futures, de- colonial options. Durham, London: Duke University Press. [19] Oyata, M. (2012). José María Arguedas: Representación y representa- tividad. A Contracorriente, 9, 35-64. [20] Rama, A. (2012). Writing across cultures: Narrative transculturation in Latin America. Durham, London: Duke University Press. [21] Ranciere, J. (1999). Disagreement. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press. [22] Ranciere, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London, New York: Continuum. [23] Rowe, W. (2000). Reading Arguedas’s foxes. In J. Ortega (Ed.), The fox from up Above and the fox from down below (pp. 283-289). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.