Back
 OJU  Vol.1 No.1 , February 2011
A Two-Stage Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG) for Managing Recurrent Proximal Penile Hypospadias in Pediatric & Adolescent Populations
Abstract: Introduction: The presence of a recurrent proximal penile hypospadius represents a surgical challenge to the urologist due to the presence of excessive scarring and fibrosis of the tissues. This problem is more pronounced in circumcised patients, in whom there is no enough skin for one stage procedures. Buccal mucosal grafts represent a good surgical option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of two stages buccal mucosal urethroplasty in pediatric & adolescent patients, presenting with recurrent proximal penile hypospadias who are circumcised. Methods: Thirty seven pediatric & adolescent patients underwent two stages buccal mucosal urethroplasty for recurrent proximal penile hypospadius. In all cases the buccal graft was placed dorsally followed by the second stage closure after 6 months. Results: The mean age was 17.7 (14-20) years. With a mean follow-up of 28.3 months, 33 patients (89.2%) had a final successful outcome. Of the 4 cases that were considered as failure, 3 patients (8.1%) developed urethra-cutaneous fistula that required closure after 3 months. The remaining patient developed meatal stenosis. Conclusion: Although buccal mucosal urethroplasty is a two staged procedure, it is feasible option for pediatric & adolescent patients presenting with recurrent proximal penile hypospadius, who had no skin available for penile flaps, with a success rate approaching 89.2%.
Cite this paper: nullM. Elsheikh and A. Fayad, "A Two-Stage Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG) for Managing Recurrent Proximal Penile Hypospadias in Pediatric & Adolescent Populations," Open Journal of Urology, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2011, pp. 4-7. doi: 10.4236/oju.2011.11002.
References

[1]   L. S. Baskin, “Hypospadias and Urethral Development”, Journal of Urology, Vol. 163, 2000, pp. 951-956.

[2]   G. Manzoni, A. Braccka, E. Palminteri and G. Marrocco, “Hypospadias Surgery: When, What and by Whom?” BJU International, Vol. 94, 2004, pp. 1188-1195.

[3]   J. F. Stecker, C. E. Horton, C. J. Devine and J. B. McCraw, “Hypospadias Cripples,” Urologic Clinics North Amemrica, Vol. 8, 1981, pp. 539-544.

[4]   G. Humby, “A One-Stage Operation for Hypospadias,” British of Journal Surgery, Vol. 29, 1941, p. 84.

[5]   D. E. Andrich and A. R. Mundy, “Substitution Urethroplasty with Buccal Mucosal-Free Grafts,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 65, 2001, p. 1131.

[6]   R. A. Burger, S. C. Muller, H. El-Damanhoury, A. Tschakaloff, H. Riedmiller and R. Hohenfellner, “The Buccal Mucosal Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: A Preliminary Report,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 147, 1992, pp. 662-664.

[7]   A. Bracka, “A Versatile Two-Stage Hypospadias Repair,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 48, 1995, pp. 345-352.

[8]   J. M. Patterson and C. R. Chapple, “Surgical Techniques in Substitution Urethroplasty Using Buccal Mucosa for the Treatment of Anterior Urethral Strictures,” European Urology, Vol. 53 (6), 2008, pp. 1162-1171.

[9]   S. N. Venn and A. R. Mundy, “Urethroplasty for Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans,” British Journal of Urology, Vol. 81, 1998, p. 735.

[10]   D. Dubey, A. Kumar, A. Mandhani, et al., “Buccal Mucosal Urethroplasty: A Versatile Technique for All Urethral Segments,” BJU International, Vol. 95, 2005, p. 625.

[11]   D. Dubey, A. Sehgal, A. Srivastava, et al., “Buccal Mucosal Urethroplasty for Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans Related Urethral Strictures: The Outcome of 1 and 2-Stage Techniques,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 179, 2005, p. 463.

[12]   A. R. Shukla, R. P. Patel and D. A. Canning, “The 2-Stage Hypospadias Repair. Is It a Misnomer?” Journal of Urology, Vol. 172, 2004, pp. 1714-1716.

 
 
Top