Airola, D. T., & Dunn, K. E. (2011). Oregon DATA project final evaluation report. Fayetteville, AR: Next Level Evaluation, Inc. http://oregondataproject.org/files/data.k12partners.org/2011-0909_FinalStateReport.docx
 Airola, D., Dunn, K. E., & Garrison, M. (2011). 3D-ME: The validation of the Data Driven Decision-Making Efficacy questionnaire. Washington, DC: the American Psychological Association Convention.
 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
 Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 292-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731492
 Aumann, C. A. (2011). Constructing model credibility in the context of policy appraisal. Environmental Modeling and Software, 26, 258-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.006
 Aydin, Y. C., Uzuntiryaki, E., & Demirdogen, B. (2011). Interplay of motivational and cognitive strategies in predicting self-efficacy and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 31, 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.518561
 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 343-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344
 Beck, J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 323-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009481115135
 Bernhardt, V. L. (2009). Data use: Data-driven decision making takes a big-picture view of the needs of teachers and students. Journal of Staff Development, 30, 24-27.
 Boz, Y., & Boz, N. (2010). The nature of the relationship between teaching concerns and sense of efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 279-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.490910
 Bruning, R., Schraw, G., & Ronning, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 Carlson, D., Borman, G., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 378-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373711412765
 Charalambos, C., Philippou, G., & Kyriakides, L. (2004). Towards a unified model on teachers’ concerns and efficacy beliefs related to mathematics reform. Proceedings of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 199-206
 Chuang, A., Liao, W., & Tai, W. (2005). An investigation of individual and contextual factors influencing training. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 159-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.2.159
 Cousins, B., & Walker, C. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systematic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Special Issue, 25-52.
 Creighton, T. B. (2007). Schools and data: The educator’s guide for using data to improve decision-making (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
 Cromey, A., Van der Ploeg, A., & Masini, B. (2000). The Call for Data-Driven Decision Making in the Midwest’s Schools: NCREL’s Response. Oak Brooks, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
 Cunningham, A. E., Zibulsky, J., & Callahan, M. D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports literacy development. Reading and Writing, 22, 487-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z
 Dembosky, J. W., Pane, J. F., Barney, H., & Christina, R. (2005). Data driving decision-making in southwestern Pennsylvania school districts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
 Dunn, K. E. (2008). The implementation of learner-centered principles: An analysis of preservice teacher beliefs and concerns. Doctoral Dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 3328225. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304576195?accountid=8361
 Dunn, K. E.,Airola, D., Garrison, M., & Nickens, B. (2011). Becoming data-driven: The influence of data-driven decision making efficacy beliefs on teachers’ consequence concerns. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association Convention.
 Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W., & Garrison, M. (2013a). Becoming data-driven: Exploring teacher efficacy and concerns related to datadriven decision making. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 222241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699899
 Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013b). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data driven decision-making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.11.002
 Dunn, K. E., & Rakes, G. C. (2011). Teaching teachers: An investigation of beliefs in teacher education students. Learning Environments Research, 14, 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9083-1
 Espin, C. A., McMaster, K. L., Rose, S. & Wayman, M. M. (2012). A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement on education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
 George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
 Gresham, G. (2009). An examination of mathematics teacher efficacy and mathematics anxiety in elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 44, 22-38.
 Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1979). Measuring Stages of Concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
 Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press.
 Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
 Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
 Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barrier to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00379.x
 Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505057
 Learner, D. K., & Timberlake, L. M. (1995). Teachers with limited computer knowledge: Variables affecting use and hints to increase use.
 Latham, G. P., Millman, Z., & Miedema, H. (1998). Theoretical, practical and organizational issues affecting training. In C. J. De Wolff, P. J. D. Drenth, & H. Thierry (Eds.), A handbook of work and organizational psychology: Personnel psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 185-207). East Sussex: Psychology Press, Ltd.
 Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 Mandinach, E. (2011). Recent developments in how the field of educational psychology has contributed to educational policy debate and implementation. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association Convention.
 Mason, S. (2002). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
 McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the efficacy-based change model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 477-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00051-1
 Murphy, P. K. (2001). Teaching as persuasion: A new metaphor for a new decade. Theory into Practice, 40, 224-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4004_2
 Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 Ohlhausen, M. M., Meyerson, M. J., & Sexton, T. (1992). Viewing innovations through the Efficacy-Based Change Model: A whole language application. Journal of Reading, 35, 536-541.
 Pajares, E., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 3-21). Amsterdam: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50004-X
 Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2004). Examining the effectiveness of innovative instructional methods on reducing statistics anxiety for graduate students in the social sciences. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 149-159.
 Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2005). Students’ perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 205-214.
 Raudenbush, S. W., Bhumirat, C., & Kamali, M. (1992). Predictors and consequences of primary teachers’ sense of efficacy and students’ perceptions of teaching quality in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 165-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(92)90006-R
 Samuel, M. (2008). Accountability to whom? For what? Teacher identity and the force field model of teacher development. Perspectives in Education, 26, 3-16.
 Sarikaya, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2005). Self-efficacy, attitude and science knowledge. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9, 3842.
 Schacht, S., &Stewart, B. J. (1990). What’s funny about statistics? A technique for reducing student anxiety. Teaching Sociology, 18, 5256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1318231
 Scherer, Y. K., & Bruce, S. (2001). Knowledge, attitudes, and selfefficacy and compliance with medical regimen, number of emergency department visits, and hospitalizations in adults with asthma. Heart Lung, 30, 250-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhl.2001.116013
 Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
 Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
 Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 Silver, W. S., Mitchel, T. R., & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performances: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1051
 Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Report, Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
 Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022171531285
 Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
 Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
 Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-driven decisionmaking: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10, 295308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_5
 Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112, 549571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505059
 Wilson, V. A. (November 1998). A study of reduction of anxiety in graduate students in an introductory educational research course. New Orleans, LA: The Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
 Wilson, V. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). Increasing and decreasing anxiety: A study of doctoral students in educational research courses. Little Rock, AR: The Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
 Zielinski, E. J., & Bernardo, J. A. (1989). The effects of a summer inservice program on secondary science teachers’ Stages of Concern, attitudes, and knowledge of selected STS concepts and its impact on students’ knowledge. San Francisco, CA: The National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
 Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016