JMF  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2013
Variance Reduction Techniques of Importance Sampling Monte Carlo Methods for Pricing Options
Abstract: In this paper we discuss the importance sampling Monte Carlo methods for pricing options. The classical importance sampling method is used to eliminate the variance caused by the linear part of the logarithmic function of payoff. The variance caused by the quadratic part is reduced by stratified sampling. We eliminate both kinds of variances just by importance sampling. The corresponding space for the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix of the logarithmic function of payoff is enlarged. Computational Simulation shows the high efficiency of the new method.
Cite this paper: Q. Zhao, G. Liu and G. Gu, "Variance Reduction Techniques of Importance Sampling Monte Carlo Methods for Pricing Options," Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2013, pp. 431-436. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2013.34045.

[1]   P. Boyle, M. Broadie and P. Glasserman, “Monte Carlo Methods for Security Pricing,” Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, Vol. 21, No. 8, 1997, pp.1267-1321.

[2]   P. Glasserman, “Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.

[3]   J. Hull and A. White, “The Use of the Control Variate Technique in Option Pricing,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1987, pp. 237-251.

[4]   A. G. Kemna and A. C. F. Vorst, “A Pricing Method for Options Based on Average Asset Values,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1990, pp. 113-129.

[5]   S. Turnbull and L. Wakeman, “A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1991, pp. 377-389.

[6]   J. Ma and C. Xu, “An Efficient Control Variate Method for Pricing Variance Derivatives under Stochastic Volatility and Jump Diffusion Models,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 235, No. 1, 2010, pp. 108-119.

[7]   R. Reider, “An Efficient Monte Carlo Technique for Pricing Options,” Working Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1993.

[8]   P. Glasserman, P. Heidelberger and P. Shahabuddin, “Importance Sampling in the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Framework,” Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1999, pp. 32-50.

[9]   F. J. Vázquez-Abad and D. Dufresne, “Accelerated Simulation for Pricing Asian Options,” Proceedings of 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington DC, 13-16 December 1998, pp. 1493-1500.

[10]   Y. Su and M. C. Fu, “Simulation in Financial Engineering: Importance Sampling in Derivative Securities Pricing,” Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation, Society for Computer Simulation International, 2000, pp. 587-596.

[11]   B. Arouna, “Robbins-Monro Algorithms and Variance Reduction in Finance,” Journal of Computational Finance, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, pp. 35-62.

[12]   L. Capriotti, “Least-squares Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Security Pricing,” Quantitative Finance, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2008, pp. 485-497.

[13]   C. Xu and L. Zhang, “On Optimal Drift Vector and Importance Sampling for Pricing Options Based on Direct Simulations,” Working Paper, 2011.

[14]   P. Glasserman, P. Heidelberger and P. Shahabuddin, “Asymptotically Optimal Importance Sampling and Stratification for Pricing Path-Dependent Options,” Mathematical Finance, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1999, pp. 117-152.

[15]   L. C. G. Rogers and D. Talay, “Numerical Methods in Finance,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.