JMF  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2013
An Extension of Some Results Due to Cox and Leland

We investigate an optimal portfolio allocation problem between a risky and a risk-free asset, as in [1]. They obtained explicit conditions for path-independence and optimality of allocation strategies when the price of the risky asset follows a geometric Brownian motion with constant asset characteristics. This paper analyzes and extends their results for dynamic investment strategies by allowing for non-constant returns and volatility. We adopt a continuous-time approach and appeal to well established results in stochastic calculus for doing so.

Cite this paper
A. Leung and W. Shi, "An Extension of Some Results Due to Cox and Leland," Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2013, pp. 416-425. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2013.34043.
[1]   J. C. Cox and H. E. Leland, “On Dynamic Investment Strategies,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 24, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 1859-1880.

[2]   R. C. Merton, “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuoustime Model,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1971, pp. 373-413.

[3]   F. Black and M. Scholes, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1973, pp. 637-654.

[4]   J. C. Cox and S. A. Ross, “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 1976, pp. 145-166.

[5]   P. Carr, H. Geman and D. Madan, “The Fine Structure of Asset Returns: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Business, Vol. 75, No. 2, 2002, pp. 305-332.

[6]   S. Hodges and R. Clarkson, “Dynamic Asset Allocation: Insights from Theory,” Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 347, No. 1684, 1994, pp. 587-598.

[7]   R. C. Merton, “Lifetime Consumption under Uncertaintiy: The Continuous Time Case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1969, pp. 247-257.

[8]   S. A. Ross, “Mutual Fund Separation in Financial Theory—The Separating Distributions,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1978, pp. 254-286.

[9]   G. S. Amin and H. M. Kat, “Hedge Fund Performance 1990-2000: Do the ‘Money Machines’ Really Add Value?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2003, pp. 251-274.

[10]   S. Vanduffel, A. Chernih, M. Maj and W. Schoutens, “A Note on the Suboptimality of Path-Dependent Pay-Offs in Lévy Markets,” Applied Mathematical Finance, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2009, pp. 315-330.

[11]   S. Kassberger and T. Liebmann, “When Are Path-Dependent Payoffs Suboptimal?” 2009.

[12]   F. C. Klebaner, “Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications,” Imperial College Press, London, 2005.

[13]   O. C. Ibe, “Markov Processes for Stochastic Modeling,” Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, 2009.

[14]   M. J. Brennana, E. S. Schwartz and R. Lagnado, “Strategic Asset Allocation,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 21, No. 8-9, 1997, pp. 1377-1403.

[15]   J. Cvitanic and V. Polimenis, “Optimal Portfolio Allocation with Higher Mo Moments,” Annals of Finance, 2008.

[16]   S. P. Sethi, “A note on Mertons Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a continuous-Time Model,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1988, pp. 395401.

[17]   A. Meucci, “Review of Dynamic Allocation Strategies: Utility Maximization, Option Replication, Insurance, Drawdown Control, Convex-Concave Management,” 2010.

[18]   K. Tanaka, “Dynamic Asset Allocation under Stochastic Interest Rate and Market Price of Risk,” 2009.

[19]   C. Chiarella, C. Hsaio and W. Semmler, “Intertemporal Investment Strategies under Inflation Risk,” University of Technology, Sydney, 2007.

[20]   S. E. Dreyfus, “Dynamic Programming and the Calculus of Variations,” Academic Press, Norwell, 1965.

[21]   S. Janson and J. Tysk, “Feynman-Kac Formulas for BlackScholes Type Operators,” Bulletin London Mathematical Society, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 269-282.