The periodic table of elements is arranged based on a series of regular polyhedron. The stability of inert gas atoms can be explained by the distribution of electrons, as well as their motion and magnetic force structure. A magnetic force regular octahedron is proposed. It is a unique configuration that best satisfies the convergence of electrons moving in the same direction within regular polyhedra. In the case of an electrostatic force crust, the formal electron spin accounts for the crusts intrinsic magnetic moment exceeding the speed of light. If one is to consider that the electron has a magnetic outer layer and an electrostatic inner layer, then the question can be solved and abovementioned inference can provide the basis for magnetic force and momentum for the regular octahedron model. The electron periphery has twenty-petal adsorptive substances; the existence of adsorptive substance causes the magnetic force greater than the electrostatic force. Each electronic shell in the regular polyhedron is in accordance with the electron configuration of periodic table of elements; the kinetic track of each electron is a surface of regular polyhedron. The magnetic properties of iron, cobalt, and nickel can be explained by the regular dodecahedron electronic shell of an atom. The electron orbit converged from reverse direction can explain diamond. The adsorptive substances found in atomic nuclei and electrons are defined as magnetic particles called magnetons. The thermodynamic magneton theory can be better explained when it is analyzed using principles of thermodynamics, superconductivity, viscosity, and even in the creation of glass. The structure of the light is a helical line.
Cite this paper
Z. Kong, "The Atomic Regular Polyhedron Electronic Shell," Journal of Modern Physics
, Vol. 4 No. 10, 2013, pp. 1-19. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.410A1001
 G. N. Lewis, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 38, 1916, pp. 762-785.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja02261a002
 X. T. Lu, H. J. Wang and B. J. Yang, “Atomic Nucleus Physics,” Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, 1981, pp. 46-47.
 O. Echt, K. Sattler and E. Recknagel, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 47, 1981, p. 1121.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1121
 W. Miehle, O. Kandler, T. Leisner and O. J. Echt, Chemical Physics, Vol. 91, 1989, p. 5940
 P. W. Stephens and J. G. King, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 51, 1983, pp. 1538-1541.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1538
 G. S. Tian, “The Origin of Metallic Ferromagnetism,” In: 10000 Selected Problems in Sciences, Physics, Science Press, Beijing, 2009, pp. 73-80.
 H. Stocker, “Taschenbuch der Physik,” Verlag Harri, Deutsch, 1996.
 A. Chaiken, “Resistivity and specific Heat in Zero Applied Magnetic Field for a Typical Superconductor,” 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cvandrhovst.png
 Y. I. Frenkel, “Kinetic Theory of Liquids,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1946.
 M. I. Ojovan, K. P. Travis and R. J. Hand, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 19, 2007, Article ID: 415107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/41/415107
 R. H. Doremus, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 92, 2002, pp. 7619-7629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1515132
 M. B. Volf, “Mathematical Approach to Glass,” Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
 M. I. Ojovan and W. E. Lee, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 95, 2004, pp. 3803-3810.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1647260