AM  Vol.2 No.1 , January 2011
Discrete Evolutionary Genetics: Multiplicative Fitnesses and the Mutation-Fitness Balance
Abstract: We revisit the multi-allelic mutation-fitness balance problem especially when fitnesses are multiplicative. Using ideas arising from quasi-stationary distributions, we analyze the qualitative differences between the fitness-first and mutation-first models, under various schemes of the mutation pattern. We give some stochastic domination relations between the equilibrium states resulting from these models.
Cite this paper: nullT. Huillet and S. Martinez, "Discrete Evolutionary Genetics: Multiplicative Fitnesses and the Mutation-Fitness Balance," Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-22. doi: 10.4236/am.2011.21002.

[1]   W. J. Ewens, “Mathematical Population Genetics. I. Theoretical Introduction,” 2nd Edition, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, Vol. 27, 2004.

[2]   R. Bürger, “The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation,” Wiley Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2000.

[3]   S. Karlin, “Mathematical Models, Problems, and Controversies of Evolutionary Theory,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (N.S.), Vol. 10, No. 2, 1984, pp. 221-273.

[4]   J. F. C. Kingman, “Mathematics of Genetic Diversity,” CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, 34. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, 1980.

[5]   J. Hermisson, O. Redner, H. Wagner and E. Baake “Mutation-Selection Balance: Ancestry, Load and Maximum Principle,” Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2002, pp. 9-46. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2002.1582

[6]   E. Baake and H.-O. Georgii, “Mutation, Selection, and Ancestry in Branching Models: A Variational Approach,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2007, pp. 257-303. doi:10.1007/s00285-006-0039-5

[7]   G. Sella and A. E. Hirsh, “The Application of Statistical Physics to Evolutionary Biology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, No. 27, 2005, pp. 9541-9546. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501865102

[8]   N. Champagnat, R. Ferrière and S. Méleard, “From Individual Stochastic Processes to Macroscopic Models in Adaptive evolution,” Stochastic Models, Vol. 24, Suppl. 1, 2008, pp. 2-44. doi:10.1080/15326340802437710

[9]   S. Shashahani, “A New Mathematical Framework for the Study of Linkage and Selection,” Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 17, No. 211, 1979, pp.1-34.

[10]   Y. M. Svirezhev, “Optimum Principles in Genetics,” Studies on Theoretical Genetics, V. A. Ratner (Ed.), USSR Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, 1972, pp. 86-102.

[11]   J. Hofbauer, “The Selection Mutation Equation,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1985, pp. 41-53.

[12]   J. N. Darroch and E. Seneta, “On Quasi-Stationary Distributions in Absorbing Discrete-Time Finite Markov chains,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1965, pp. 88-100. doi:10.2307/3211876

[13]   S. Martínez, “Quasi-Stationary Distributions for Birth-death Chains. Convergence Radii and Yaglom Limit,” Cellular Automata and Cooperative Systems (Les Houches, 1992), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 396, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 491-505.

[14]   S. Martínez and M. E. Vares, “A Markov Chain Associated with the Minimal Quasi-Stationary Distribution of Birth-Death Chains,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1995, pp. 25-38. doi:10.2307/3214918