OJPP  Vol.3 No.4 , November 2013
Magic of Language
ABSTRACT
Language, through the discrete nature of linguistic names and strictly determined grammatical rules, creates absolute, “quantized”, sharply separated “facts” within the external world that is continuous, “fuzzy” and relational in its essence. Therefore, it is similar, in some important sense, to magic, which attributes causal and creative power to magical words and formulas. On the one hand, language increases greatly the effectiveness of the processes of thinking and interpersonal communication, yet, on the other hand, it determines and distorts to a large extent the picture of the world created within the mind. The relatively smallest (but still significant) magical admixture is present in science, because of its relatively reliable methodology, while the largest is found in religion and a large part of philosophy. The magical nature of language also manifests itself in logic and mathematics that refer to ill determined, fuzzy objects, sets and relations in the real world. The meaning of linguistic names is based on the conceptual network—an epiphenomenon (continuous in its essence) of the neural network—where interactions between particular concepts are based on the relation of connotation. The names and formulas of language correspond to these concepts which are best separated and determined. A direct relation of denotation between the elements of language and “facts” of the world is an illusion. While we cannot dispense with language because of its immense usefulness, we must remember about its “fact-creating” nature and influence on our thought and cognitive processes. The picture of the reality created as the result of them is to a large extent formed and deformed by the nature of language, and not by the “immanent” properties of the world in itself.

Cite this paper
Korzeniewski, B. (2013). Magic of Language. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 455-465. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34067.
References
[1]   Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[2]   Barrow, J. D. (1992). Pi in the sky. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[3]   Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harper and Row.

[4]   Coveney, P., & Highfield, R. (1991) The arrow of time. The quest to solve science’s greatest mystery. Flamingo.

[5]   Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[6]   Frege, G. (1960). On sense and reference. In: P. Geach &, M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56-78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

[7]   Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time: From the Big Bang to black holes. New York: Bantam Books.

[8]   Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86, 65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050

[9]   Korzeniewski, B. (2010). From neurons to self-consciousness. How the brain generates the mind. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

[10]   Korzeniewski, B. (2013). Formal similarities between cybernetic definition of life and cybernetic model of self-consciousness: Universal definition/model of individual. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 314328. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.32049

[11]   Penrose, R. (1990). The emperor’s new mind. Concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics. London: Vintage.

[12]   Piaget, J. (1953). How children form mathematical concepts. Scientific American, 189, 74-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1153-74

[13]   Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. London: Heinemann.

[14]   Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

[15]   Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[16]   Russell, B. (1923). Vagueness. The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 1, 84-92. http://web.archive.org/web/20080515181625/cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/Russell/vagueness/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048402308540623

[17]   Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Brace: Harcourt.

[18]   Schrodinger, E. (1992). What is life? Cambridge: Press Sindicate of the University of Cambridge.

[19]   Tegmark, M., & Wheeler, J. A. (2003). 100 years of the quantum mysteries. Scientific American, 284, 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0201-68

[20]   Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 42, 229-231.

[21]   Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus logico-philosophicus.

 
 
Top