ABSTRACT We consider the effect of a magnetic field on the motion of an atomic electron in its orbit. The usual treatment deals with the change in magnetic dipole moment assuming the electron's speed changes but the radius of its orbit remains unchanged. We derive the change in the magnetic dipole moment allowing both the speed and the radius to change. The cases of fixed radius on one hand and of fixed speed on the other are treated as special cases of our general case.
Cite this paper
nullS. AL-Jaber and A. M. Abu-Labdeh, "Effect of a Magnetic Field on an Atomic Orbital," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2011.21001.
 R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, “The Feynman Lectures on Physics,” Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964.
 E. M. Purcell, “Electricity and Magnetism,” 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.
 D. J. Griffiths, “Intro-duction to Electrodynamics,” 3rd ed., prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1999.
 N. Nauthier, “A New-Faraday Approach to Elec-tromagnetic Energy and Angular Momentum Storage in an Electromechanical System,” Am. J. Phys., Vol. 70, 2002, p. 1034.
 S. Olszewski and T. Rolinski, “Orbital Angular Momentum, Its Torque and Magnetic Moment Calculated for the Electrons Circulating on the Landau Levels of a Crystalline Solid,” Physica Status Solidi(b), Vol. 245, 2008, p. 1623.
 J. M. Aguirregabiria, A. Hernandez and M. Rivas, “A Lewis-Tolman –Like Paradox,” Eur. J. Phys., Vol. 3, 1982, p. 30.
 V. Kumar, “Understanding the Focusi Charge Par-ticle in a Solenoid Magnetic Field,” Am. J.Phys., Vol. 77, 2009, p. 737.
 S. L. O’Dell and R. K. P. Zia, “Classical and Semiclassical Diamagnetism: A Critique of Treatment in Ele-mentary Texts,” Am. J. Phys., Vol. 54, 1986, p. 32.
 B. D. Mills, Jr., “Satellite Paradox,” Am. J. Phys., Vol. 27, 1959, p. 115.
 L. Blitzer, “Satellite Orbit Paradox: A General View,” Am. J. Phys., Vol. 39, 1971, p. 887.
 F. P. J. Rim-rott and F. A. Salustri, “Open Orbits in Satellite Dynamics,” Tech. Mech., Vol. 21, 2001, p. 207.